I know this has not been updated for a few months, but I would like to objectively set the record straight for both BJJ and the Gracie Combatives Program. Many people here are not informed enough about the point of the Gracie University online training. It is NOT the case you can just mail any video of their techniques and they will mail out belts to all who send in a fee and video. The video evaluation has specific guidelines and paying attention to detail is essential.
It doesn't matter what guidelines they use to grade a video. Correspondence rank advancement doesn't work. Jiujitsu is an art of application. If you as an instructor have never met your student or rolled with him to see him apply his skills, how will you evaluate him. The best you can gleam from a video is an idea of what he knows but nothing about what he can actually do.
Here I will lay out the difference between both BJJ and the Gracie university online program, which includes the combatives program as well. I have trained at a Gracie Barra affiliated school for six years and earned a purple belt. I do both prgrams! The Gracie Barra I will address as BJJ and the Gracie university as GJJ as many have done here already. BJJ really doesn't have a set lesson plan that students can know in advance what the lessons will be or what techniques will be learned in a set month. It is pretty much up to the instructor.
Barra has a fundamentals curriculum and an advanced curriculum.
So you can learn more techniques than me per se if you have a better instructor. You can learn the coolest sweeps and counters if your instructor happens to be a better or more informed instructor than mine instuctor or the next guy's instuctor. So that is a negative guys.
A huge negative to a correspondence course is that everyone learns the same thing from the same DVD. Because people are different in temperament and physique, different people will end up doing the same technique differently, making adjustments to fit a given technique to their game and themselves. You need an instructor for this variability, someone who knows your game, has watched your progression, and knows how to guide you. Unfortunately, a DVD cannot do this for you.
The bad experience many peole have is that the live rolling comes with pain and injury when rolling with jerks. Jerk is the guy who is going all out to win --even cheat and not care just as long as he doesn't get tapped. All BJJ schools have at least one of these guys.
Those guys tend to have enough ego issues that they don't last long in the academy. Even if they stick around, that is not the fault of BJJ as a system, that is the fault of the instructor for failing to notice that someone is rolling like a jerk and injuring people. It is also partly on the students for not speaking up about it either.
That aside, many BJJ guys don't care about quality or form in techniques: the form is not correct due to speed of the technique being applied to get the guy to tap. In rolling, we try to tap the guy quickly before he can counter it so form is often sacrificed. The main goal is to tap the guy and not care how the submission looks (ie, wrong grip, hips too high when stepping over, no total control of the opponent,etc). GJJ has a focus on repetition to imporve form and over all effectiveness of a submission. GJJ requires both form and the result to be positive. BJJ has a focus on the result -- who cares how pretty my arm bar is as long as the guy taps. GJJ makes the claim that art cares about form: what can be better than a beautifully executed arm bar and a submission to boot? Art requires control over your own body as well as control over the opponent. How many top BJJ experts have sloppy form? I have not seen any. So at the high levels form is usually there for both BJJ and GJJ. The difference is GJJ tries to instill quality form EARLY and to keep it. BJJ won't get that till purple or brown.
This might be the case at white belt. But only at white belt. After that, goon strength and sacrificing technique stops working, you actually have to improve technique to have success against your peers in competition. I have yet to see a BJJ academy that doesn't stress the details in a technique, even for the beginners. If a practitioner fails to listen closely for these details, well then that's the practitioner's fault, not BJJ's fault as a system, and undoubtedly he will have more difficulty after the white belt level.
BJJ you sort have to figure out things many times for yourself. GJJ makes learning easy and makes it impossible NOT to understand.
There is this concept called asking questions. You cannot do it with a DVD. You can do it with an instructor. The only time you have to figure out things for yourself in BJJ is when you don't ask questions during drilling, positional drills/rolls, or open mat.
GJJ makes the claim knowledge and Understanding is a different mindset from the BJJ counterpart. Part of that is Rorion's claim that a GJJ guy doesn't have to be athletic and have the skill to beat a biger, stronger and more athletic opponent. This is huge. No one addresses Rorion's claim. Is it true or not?
It is true to a certain degree only when the bigger, stronger, more athletic opponent has less skill than the smaller practitioner. Also have to consider that with the converse situation, well anybody can get caught.
GJJ teaches combatives to beginners and then goes through the master cycle. The master cycle teaches more advanced moves according to rank. Each stripe learns more than the previous one. This like in the old days where brown belts learn more than the lower ranks. Things are rank specific. BJJ is not rank specific. You learn what ever the instructor likes. So there is no separate rank lessons.
That isn't true, Barra has beginner and advanced classes. Most other BJJ associations/schools have that as well. I have seen schools with smaller enrollment that hold classes for all ranks, that still teach different techniques to beginners and advanced in a single class or even just more advanced variations for the latter.
GJJ claims that given enough repetitons the techniques will be automatic just like Katas in the other Martial arts. These automatic reactions should be in the quality of form as practiced. So the quality should be high in form and execution. No one can argue that the older arts did not practice this way. Practice thousands of repetitions with no resistance then gradually add resistance to 100 percent all out resistance -- being a jerk opponet. This is what GJJ is doing. BJJ does not. BJJ is to roll enough for you get the technique to work.
Completely untrue. I have never seen a BJJ school that just teaches moves and then goes straight into rolling. There is always drilling with minimal resistance, then adding resistance back in gradually to challenge the technique while in an isolated setting, then POSITIONAL rolling which adds some stochastity back into the drill, then finally free rolling.
Just "rolling enough to get the technique to work" is ridiculous, it would create so much room for bad habits. I have yet to see a school teach in this manner that you describe.