- Joined
- Jul 9, 2016
- Messages
- 10,549
- Reaction score
- 4
I have a feeling that going against Pena in mma wouldn't end up very well for Gordon Ryan.
Gordon Ryan's style is not great for mma.
I have a feeling that going against Pena in mma wouldn't end up very well for Gordon Ryan.
Gordon Ryan's style is not great for mma.
All I would say and it may not even be your point is that Cornelius and Cooper is that Cornelius is very experienced in sub only grappling alongside points tournaments. And Cooper has always grappled as if points didn't exist (his style is actually very similar to Garry Tonon) and he usually lives and dies by that sword.This year they beat Keenan, Yuri, Gilbert Burns, Rustam Chsiev, Bill Cooper, Mansher Khera, and drew with Tanquino and Toquino. Their only submission loss was after 45 minutes against Felipe Pena. Everybody at or below their level barely lasted a minute.
But to the original point, their schtick is not "this is the best style of BJJ for MMA," its more "this is no bullshit what's effective about BJJ." Not saying I agree, but it's certainly eye-opening that once you take away the points, the gi, and the leglock restrictions these highest level world champs aren't as dominant as they seemed.
Take off that crown now, boi.
Any time you see pro wrestling antics get attention, it's because the antics hit some core taboo or unspoken conflict within the given culture. For DDS, it's that they are irreverant to many norms of BJJ, such as traditional ideas of positional dominance, stoic behavioral codes, open tournaments as ultimate arbiters of skill, wearing the gi, etc. Just as significantly, they are loud East Coast white guys with a Kiwi coach, instead of quiet, team-first students with an old school Brazilian grandmaster.
And in other news Mike Perry is a can.
I think that gets overlooked a lot with them. Maybe they don't state it all the time but I would even say it's as specific as "this is what is effective when the only goal is simply submit the other person when we are not wearing gis and when we can have as much as time as possible to work."
Fixed it for you. Get it right next time.
BJJ culture highly values humility and respect, and has an entrenched patriarchal system telling us who to respect; it's not just that the DDS guys are generally obnoxious, it's that they target their obnoxiousness toward the pillars of the culture.
Please explain the etiquette I got wrong. I will get it right if I understand why you made the correction
This.
I think that gets overlooked a lot with them. Maybe they don't state it all the time but I would even say it's as specific as "this is what is effective when the only goal is simply submit the other person when we are not wearing gis and when we can have as much as time as possible to work."
Exactly.That's a good way of putting it. The issue I have is that being bottom in side control may not be very bad in a sub-only format, but it sure sucks if strikes are allowed. So while I like sub-only tournaments and certainly applaud the DDS for moving the leg-lock game forward, I think we have to remember that getting your guard passed is actually bad in MMA or a real fight.
That said, it isn't like the leg-lock game *can't* work in MMA. But in MMA it is high-risk, high-reward whereas in sub-only grappling it is low-risk, high-reward.