- Joined
- Feb 23, 2007
- Messages
- 65,561
- Reaction score
- 8,847
I would have risked it to save the kids. I would have tried to play it smart as possible, and that may have cost a couple lives, but I would have gone in.
As a lawyer, I can say that there may well be a lawsuit and it will be extremely embarrassing for the sheriff and the department, but it's un-winnable. There's absolutely no law, legal precedent or argument that would support a judgment against the sheriff's office or the officer(s) at the scene. They'd have a better chance suing the school district but that's a loser too. Wouldn't be surprised if the sheriff ends up resigning though, he's gonna get dragged through the mud big time.
This is what I've been wondering. This guy, the campus officer scot Peterson has been portrayed as a horrible coward, but having him run in there alone seems crazy and (I'm not a cop or ever had any training) it doesn't seem like what they would train someone to do without any backup, or knowledge about the shooter. Sending him running in seems like a recipe for either him to accidentally shoot the wrong person or just get blasted himselfWe just had active shooter training today. What they said was cops prior to Columbine were supposed to wait for the SWAT team. Nowadays they wait till there are four or more cops to go in
As a lawyer, I can say that there may well be a lawsuit and it will be extremely embarrassing for the sheriff and the department, but it's un-winnable. There's absolutely no law, legal precedent or argument that would support a judgment against the sheriff's office or the officer(s) at the scene. They'd have a better chance suing the school district but that's a loser too. Wouldn't be surprised if the sheriff ends up resigning though, he's gonna get dragged through the mud big time.
As far as the previous reports of him making threats and stuff like that? You could argue that there was some negligence there but it'd still be a stretch. I don't know the details but from what I know it doesn't seem like his comments reached the level of a criminal threat, in which case there is only so much that can be done. Part of freedom of speech is that you can't just arrest everyone that makes a vague threat or some stupid statement. Combine that with school counseling/mental health programs that are underfunded and what can you really expect?Good point regarding day of shooting.
What about the multiple interactions with suspect?
Yeah that Walt was a cheeky motherfucker:
Shut not your doors to me, proud high schools,
For that which was lacking among you all, yet needed most, I bring;
A rifle I have made for your dear sake, O students,
And for you, O football coach, and you, athletic director;
The bullets of my gun mean nothing, the firing of them everything;
A rifle semiautomatic, not banned in Florida, nor caught by campus cops;
But you will feel every bullet, O Libtard! un-arm’d Libtard!
They shall pass through your flesh to swim the air, the walls,
With joy in slaughtering you, O students.
This is what I've been wondering. This guy, the campus officer scot Peterson has been portrayed as a horrible coward, but having him run in there alone seems crazy and (I'm not a cop or ever had any training) it doesn't seem like what they would train someone to do without any backup, or knowledge about the shooter. Sending him running in seems like a recipe for either him to accidentally shoot the wrong person or just get blasted himself
Yeah that's different and that's just come out in the news recently, but this guy scot Peterson has been getting destroyed in the press all week. The 3 other guys haven't even had their names releasedIt wasn't just him though, there were 3 other deputies there that stayed outside. The cops had no problem going in when they showed up.
Because you fail to recognize the BASIC difference between protecting themselves in the pursuit of their DUTY vs sitting outside listening to kids get killed. I can't even have a conversation with you. I just can't.
As far as the previous reports of him making threats and stuff like that? You could argue that there was some negligence there but it'd still be a stretch. I don't know the details but from what I know it doesn't seem like his comments reached the level of a criminal threat, in which case there is only so much that can be done. Part of freedom of speech is that you can't just arrest everyone that makes a vague threat or some stupid statement. Combine that with school counseling/mental health programs that are underfunded and what can you really expect?
I remember the hollywood shootings, 2 guys with AK's were going off. Cops came and took cover and cornered the guys. They were vastly underpowered to go head on with such opponents, and I dont blame them.Breaking News - Cops are paid to be heroes, not cowards.
I remember the hollywood shootings, 2 guys with AK's were going off
Agreed.
Here's Nixon appointee Warren Burger:
I could have swore multiple times the news said the protocol after Sandy Hook is go in there and engage the shooter because hanging out safely outside will mean more little kids dead. They cited at least one instance where the shooter killed himself the moment good guys with guns showed up for firefight.I don't know what the protocol is for situations like this, like if he was supposed to wait for backup or something, during an active shooter situation.
On the surface though, it sounds like he was just being a giant pussy.
Unless he is a total piece of shit, he will likely have those 17 poor souls on his conscience for quite some time.
A ton of hate and criticism is being dumped on Scot Peterson, the campus police officer at the Florida school where the recent shooting occurred because he stayed outside to wait for backup during the shooting rather than going inside to "kill the killer".
To me, it seems like he is being totally scapegoated. It seems pretty unreasonable to expect the guy to go in, not knowing what is going on and with just a pistol and no backup. Seems crazy but the guy is being portrayed as a coward and partially responsible, and has been essentially forced to retire.
If anyone out there is a cop or former cop, wouldn't the normal, standard operating procedure in that situation be to secure the outside of the area and wait for backup? Do they instruct officers or teach them at academy to go in alone in such a situation?
UPDATE: it's come out that maybe there were multiple officers that stayed outside, which is obviously a different situation. But assuming an officer alone, would they be following procedure to go in without backup in this type of situation?