Floyd is 40, Conor is 28

TGArthur

Square up with yo'self motherf*cker
@Steel
Joined
Nov 20, 2005
Messages
27,162
Reaction score
10,470
Hasn't fought in two years and is 40 years old. Wouldn't be surprised if Floyd looks a lot slower than he normally was in this fight. In combat sports, just being a fraction of a second out of place could be the end of your night. We will see how this plays out
 
Conor would get smashed by amateurs who haven't trained in 5 years.

don't worry about Floyd and his 2 years

conor has no chance
this is a fake fight
 
A 40 year old unbeaten pro who looked less likely to lose as he got older and not more likely vs a 28 year old complete novice who boxed a bit when at school, wtf is there to think about.
 
Its rly not that much of a difference like if ur 40 u still try to date 28 year olds
 
Last edited:
Thoughts?
Simple response here.

When Bernard Hopkins was 40, would you have said that Anderson Silva could beat him in a boxing match, just because he was 29/30?

Age has nothing to do with this fight. Floyd was 38 and he beat a former world champion in Berto, 11 rounds to 1 on my card. Floyd also beat Manny Pacquiao a mere 2 years ago.

What on earth makes people think age will be the making of him losing in a boxing ring to a fucking MMA fighter!?!?!?
 
Floyds old for a fighter.

Look...he SHOULD win. He SHOULD embarrass Conor.

Or he COULD get caught by a powerful precision puncher and look like a fuckin idiot.

Sounds like a fun night to me.
 
Floyd : recently retired undefeated

Conor: Stockton slapped
 
Floyd could be 60 and he'd still be a heavy favorite.
 
Back
Top