[QUOTE="fonzob1, post: 138335491, member: 465871" To obtain a FISA warrant, officials had to testify under oath that the claims made in the dossier (and any other "evidence" they had) were factual as far as they knew. You are painting your own reality for your own partisan reasons.[/QUOTE] Bullshit. This is utterly legally unsound. In order to obtain a warrant you need to establish probable cause, and to a smaller degree demonstrate that the scope of the warrant will help you flesh out said accusations. I'm not even sure what the fuck you're talking about above. You don't have to testify under oath about a warrant application. It's already a submitted court document. If I submit a warrant application with 20 eye witness accounts to the identity of a bank robber, and 1 out of those 20 turns out to be complete and utter horseshit, the warrant still stands. For fucks sake, the compiler of the dossier has stated that the dossier contained no information the fbi and justice department already had. You aren't doing anything other that beating the partisan drum, without any idea what the argument actually is.