Yeah, I remembered that wrong. It seemed off when I typed it and went back to check and was just waiting for the shitstorm.
I respect that you at least own up to that. A lot of people here would just try to backtrack their words and you did not, so kudos.
In any case, there is a very "What have you done for me lately" mentality to fighter rankings. The truth is time catches everyone, every undefeated streak, every person. It catches some faster than others.
I watched from the very beginning till now and every era had guys who looked unstoppable until they were stopped. MMA has evolved faster than any other sport specifically because of the advanced training, analytical and videotape capability of the modern age speeding its evolution. Entrenched sports had a slow evolution.
Matt Hughes and BJ Penn looked like the fighters of their generation(And in ways, they were), but if you take their records from age 30 onward. BJ is 1-7-1 and Hughes from age 32 is 4-6-0.
It just happens. Some guys lose it earlier than others. Some guys continually adapt. In Hockey, Ray Bourque was runner up for Norris trophy best defensiveman in his rookie year in 1979-80 and runner up for Norris best defenseman in his retirement year of 2000-2001. But the vast majority of Hockey players go downhill hard around age 30 and have seen their best scoring years at ages 23-27. That's sports.
In the end, if you look at the rosters during Fedor's run(Or Wanderlei's, etc), it blatantly obvious that the large purses Pride was awarding had attracted the bulk of top MMA talent and everyone back then knew it.
Was it as deep as it is now? Of course not.
But It is revisionist history to try to play Pride down as a bunch of hacks when the UFC was literally in a worse situation regarding talent.