And his polling has only went up since being impeached.... Lol. Hopefully Pelosi doesnt send it to the senate for months and see where we are at then.
FBI assessing another Trump / Russia collusion dossier
- Thread starter JosephDredd
- Start date
And his polling has only went up since being impeached.... Lol. Hopefully Pelosi doesnt send it to the senate for months and see where we are at then.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 25,273
- Reaction score
- 12,676
The sad part is that you’re not trolling
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2015
- Messages
- 26,651
- Reaction score
- 5
what makes you say something as silly as that?
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 11,378
- Reaction score
- 2,821
I'm CLEARLY referring to the witnesses testifying against Trump, like the "whistleblower" (Eric Ciaramella). The burden to prove guilt is on the accuser(s); there has NEVER been a burden on the defense to prove innocence.
It is NOT Trumps responsibility to prove himself innocent.
If the corporate democrats didn't have the evidence and testimony to move forward with proper proceedings, they shouldn't have held them in the first place.
Lawyers in FBI falsifying classified documents and extorting people and you ask that?
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2015
- Messages
- 6,211
- Reaction score
- 1,813
https://news.google.com/articles/CB...bW92YWwtcG9sbD9hbXA?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en
What was that? His polling did what? Lmao
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2010
- Messages
- 30,799
- Reaction score
- 7,619
Yeah... First you claim you don't want to hear from "secondary" sources and then you complain because the whistleblower - the very definition of a "hearsay" witness - didn't testify. Shit troll elsewhere.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 11,378
- Reaction score
- 2,821
The whistleblower is the reason this whole ukraine investigation started.
To shield him from testifying and being cross-examined is denying an accused the right to face his accuser. He would be testifying about things he personally saw and heard, and how it lead to the initiation of procedures and investigations. What we got was people saying what they heard second-hand from him. There was no opportunity to cross-examine the initial source of the accusation, not only to get him under oath in front of congress, but to also investigate the steps that took place during the process itself. This isn't complicated.
The corporate Dems should have got their ducks in a row before initiating an inquiry.
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2010
- Messages
- 30,799
- Reaction score
- 7,619
lol Just stop.
If a kid sitting in a public restroom stall tells the police that he overheard two guys plotting a murder at the sink - and he identifies those men to the cops - are you going to be most interested in hearing the kid repeating what he has already testified to or hearing the men he identified testifying to what they were actually discussing in the bathroom?
D
Deleted member 457759
Guest
Yes but we all know this is more attempts to rig the election, just like last time. They're trying to make people feel that he's a failed president when in fact hes a super successful one.
Dems only care what things look and feel like, they have divorce themselves from integrity.
Integrity must be a white male thing to them or something.
