- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 34,002
- Reaction score
- 0
I promise no one will get AIDS if they post in this thread.
Is that the problem, are people worried this thread has AIDS?
Is that the problem, are people worried this thread has AIDS?
I'm surprised more Trump supporters aren't posting in this thread.
Here is the other side
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...umps-inauguration_us_5873e26fe4b043ad97e516f7
"WASHINGTON ― A left-wing political group released a new video Monday of a counter-sting that has uncovered evidence of right-wing activists trying to sow chaos at Donald Trump’s inaugural ceremony, an effort to portray critics of Trump who march against him as violent fringe figures."
It seems that there's one party that is willing to do absolutely anything to serve the interests of the corporate sector, and there's another party that is willing to do almost anything to serve the interests of the corporate sector, and yet there's no way to form or get support for a legit third party.
That's a coup of some kind. A really insane situation...
Sibel Edmonds story update
William binney story
Both of these stories show that their is no legal whistle-blower path in this country. You will have your life turned upside down, lose your business, have your date of birth classified, have a gag order put on congress, have your right to due process in court stripped, and the media will conspire against you.
Sibel Edmonds told us 10 years ago Denny Hastert was a pedophile, and there was an MSM blackout on this. 10 years later with Hassert prosecuted for pedophilia we have more evidence of a deep state. Democratic Illinois Rep. Janice Schakowsky currently sits in office, and she belongs in jail. She is a Turkish and Isreali asset through blackmail. The MSM blackout continues to this day.
William Binney, tried to tell everyone what Edward Snowden released to the press, through legal channels, and very few know his name.
You can not argue with a straight face that Edward Snowden had a legal whistle blower path he chose not to follow. It just isn't true.
I agree, I don't get it. It's like this thread has AIDS.
I started it as a Snowden thread, no traffic. Updated it to try and make it a left and right uniting issue, no traffic. Moved it to being about the Trump agitator story still no traffic.
I swear I could make this about Milo banging a tranny, and it would still not get any traffic.
I'm telling you man, if we could ever get someone to pull this string, and investigate this, we would find a rabbit hole that never ends.
I wonder if half this subforum are just a bunch of paid internet trolls.
Or bots
It is possible...
How? When has the US ever won a war without violating parts of constitution? A war always makes its own laws.
The constitution is an over 200-year-old document. How can a 200-year old document be the basis or rulebook for fighting a war in 2017 a completley different time period.
The dynamic the war on terror has taken never in the slightest occurred to the people that wrote the constitution.
hmmm.
American media might finally have been driven mad with self deception. They don't talk about the politicians who voted for the Iraq war as being in any way responsible for it. There is no mention of holding America accountable to international law, almost anywhere, ever. They leave stories like this one behind and don't have deep investigations. Hardly anything about the national scandal that is gerrymandering. Hardly anything about citizens united and how it was financed.
They won't even really report on the history that led to movements like Black Lives Matter in a serious way. They don't talk about co intel pro, Herbert Hoover, the assassination of Fred Hampton, or any of the really serious and legitimate reasons black people distrust authorities. They will call police racist, sure, but won't get into the roots of why they might be that way or present solutions that might unite people.
IMO if you're going to report about black on black crime, or blacks killing police, or police killing blacks, you also have to offer context, report on the long and legit history that is well known in black communities (which has made those communities very difficult to police). People know about the infiltration of black activist groups going all the way back to Marcus Garvey, media is just setting people up to keep fighting and not really teaching them anything new... like a motivational speech to stay angry and keep fighting with no plan to end the war...
The hard right media at least seems aware it's lying.
NYT for instance will hardly ever report that the annexation of crimea, for example, came after a referendum in which the people there overwhelmingly voted in favour of becoming a part of Russia, and will report on climate change "debates" as if that is the only issue that involves pollution!
I hate to make this comparison but it's out there waiting to be made... German media was rife with stories about Polish "atrocities" and the problems with Polish culture for a few years leading up to the invasion. The rest of the world looked at Germany like it was a crazy place, led by a raving madman with an absurd and nonsensical business/state run media, but their journalists never really picked up those stories. They reported Italian fascist opinion columns and the like but didn't do much else. Germany and German media became so insulted and bizarre they couldn't even hear the people from other countries when they told them the stories they were missing. How people were being paid to rig up false flag events, for instance. and how insane they they were acting, constantly threatening other countries while only talking about the threats those countries posed to them... and so on...
Israel pls go
Seriously fuck off and leave my government alone, take your aipac money and leave
Israel should be terrified that both the left and alt right hate them
Have you read the constitution?
It is an incredibly short and broad document that doesn't detail every speck of the government, it's a general framework, guide and set of limits for the government. in the constitution and Declaration of Independence they put a strong emphasis that the government is there to protect our rights and we should always have a gun to their head in case they even think of becoming tyrannical
If terrorists can force us to ruin the constitution, by having the government overstepping their bounds, the terrorists have already won and will have done more damage than any bomb could
Well I feel this thread is a kind of media analysis discussion as well as a story about a particular group of people/event so I felt my comment was relevant to the subject at hand
I don't know what else to say about this
Did you find the evidence Edmonds presented against Schakowsky as an Turkish/Israeli agent to be credible?
Sort of. Not really. The guy caught on video is compelling. As for Edmons, well it's just her talking. Even when it comes to documents, I am no expert. This would all have to come out through proper journalistic channels (mainstream press or Glenn Greenwald/wikileaks)... I didn't watch the whole video of her speaking because I got the jist of it, executive order to gag her, etc.