Democrat Janice Schakowsky is a Turkish/Israeli agent. Video hiring Trump agitators was her husband

You'd think that this would be something people would have heard of, but apparently, the reason no one has is that it's crazy and, BTW, not even what Edmonds claims.

Here's Edmonds:

Yes, and in 2000, another representative was added to the list, Jan Schakowsky, the Democratic congresswoman from Illinois. Turkish agents started gathering information on her, and they found out that she was bisexual. So a Turkish agent struck up a relationship with her. When Jan Schakowsky’s mother died, the Turkish woman went to the funeral, hoping to exploit her vulnerability. They later were intimate in Schakowsky’s townhouse, which had been set up with recording devices and hidden cameras. They needed Schakowsky and her husband Robert Creamer to perform certain illegal operational facilitations for them in Illinois. They already had Hastert, the mayor, and several other Illinois state senators involved. I don’t know if Congresswoman Schakowsky ever was actually blackmailed or did anything for the Turkish woman.

Great story! Doesn't really sound plausible, though, and the lack of any follow-up suggests that there was nothing to it. I'm guessing this is another Karen Hudes-type situation.
 
You'd think that this would be something people would have heard of, but apparently, the reason no one has is that it's crazy and, BTW, not even what Edmonds claims.

Here's Edmonds:



Great story! Doesn't really sound plausible, though, and the lack of any follow-up suggests that there was nothing to it. I'm guessing this is another Karen Hudes-type situation.

Jack don't you think her pedophile claims against hastert being proven, should give her the benefit of the doubt?

If not that, then atleast Schakowsky's refusal to meet Edmonds in a open session of Congress under oath where she will make the same claims, citing FBI document numbers?

Someone is lying here, and Edmonds is willing to go under oath to tell her side. Schakowsky isn't. That should tell you something.
 
Last edited:
Where are all the Trump supporters here?

This is a sitting democrat rep. You should be foaming at the mouth to take this women down.
 
I do not know about that lady but in regards to Snowden he violated a very important rule.

In a time of war it is not the truth that matters but only victory.

No one will care if the NSA or whoever recorded some phone calls in 100 years.
However, everyone will care if the US loses the war on terror.
 
I do not know about that lady but in regards to Snowden he violated a very important rule.

In a time of war it is not the truth that matters but only victory.

No one will care if the NSA or whoever recorded some phone calls in 100 years.
However, everyone will care if the US loses the war on terror.

Watch the binney video, and he will explain that the program "Thin Tread" was more effective, and constitutional.

Your choice of win the war on terror, or violate the Constitution, is a false dichotomy.
 
Jack don't you think her pedophile claims against hastert being proven, should give her the benefit of the doubt?

Her claims appear to be a mixture of true-ish stuff and false stuff.

You didn't address the fact that your claim is very different from hers.
 
Her claims appear to be a mixture of true-ish stuff and false stuff.

You didn't address the fact that your claim is very different from hers.

Did you watch the video?

She makes that claim there.

If it is true'ish at all that Schakowsky has been hooked, we need an investigation.
 
Watch the binney video, and he will explain that the program "Thin Tread" was more effective, and constitutional.

Your choice of win the war on terror, or violate the Constitution, is a false dichotomy.

How? When has the US ever won a war without violating parts of constitution? A war always makes its own laws.
The constitution is an over 200-year-old document. How can a 200-year old document be the basis or rulebook for fighting a war in 2017 a completley different time period.
The dynamic the war on terror has taken never in the slightest occurred to the people that wrote the constitution.
 
How? When has the US ever won a war without violating parts of constitution? A war always makes its own laws.
The constitution is an over 200-year-old document. How can a 200-year old document be the basis or rulebook for fighting a war in 2017 a completley different time period.
The dynamic the war on terror has taken never in the slightest occurred to the people that wrote the constitution.

Destroying the fabric of the rule of law, and the document that gives you your right to bear arms, to free speech, when there is no need to, is losing the war, not winning it.
 
Destroying the fabric of the rule of law, and the document that gives you your right to bear arms, to free speech, when there is no need to, is losing the war, not winning it.

I feel like I am derailing your thread here, if I do so sorry that wasn't my intention.

Anyway, you don't destroy the rule of law or your rights to bear arms. It is just that with the nature of the war on terror collecting people's data is a very important factor to win this war.
Because that is how the enemy recruits soldiers and spreads its message. It is their greatest weapon.
It is something we have never see before. And we will have to adapt to this kind of warfare. It would not be the first time that certain aspects of your constitution have been found to not be appropriate anymore for the current time period. And certainly not the firs time the constitution was violated in order to win a war.
 
I feel like I am derailing your thread here, if I do so sorry that wasn't my intention.

Anyway, you don't destroy the rule of law or your rights to bear arms. It is just that with the nature of the war on terror collecting people's data is a very important factor to win this war.
Because that is how the enemy recruits soldiers and spreads its message. It is their greatest weapon.
It is something we have never see before. And we will have to adapt to this kind of warfare. It would not be the first time that certain aspects of your constitution have been found to not be appropriate anymore for the current time period. And certainly not the firs time the constitution was violated in order to win a war.
We're not at war. Stop being histrionic. The war on drugs isn't an actual war either.
 
I feel like I am derailing your thread here, if I do so sorry that wasn't my intention.

Anyway, you don't destroy the rule of law or your rights to bear arms. It is just that with the nature of the war on terror collecting people's data is a very important factor to win this war.
Because that is how the enemy recruits soldiers and spreads its message. It is their greatest weapon.
It is something we have never see before. And we will have to adapt to this kind of warfare. It would not be the first time that certain aspects of your constitution have been found to not be appropriate anymore for the current time period. And certainly not the firs time the constitution was violated in order to win a war.
It's all good. The original thread was about Snowden.

I will follow up this thread over the weekend with a thread specifically for the Edmonds video.

Again I will ask you to watch the binney video to understand how we could have a more effective system without mass surveillance on Americans.
 


Rep. Schakowsky Denies Lesbian Spy Charges


Well step up and do it under oath in Congress Schakowsky. If you're scared, say you're scared.
 
U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky under fire after husband accused of voter fraud, orchestrating violence at Trump rallies

Lauren Duquette/The Daily Northwestern

Republican congressional candidate Joan McCarthy Lasonde speaks to supporters and the media outside of the office of Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Evanston) at 820 Davis St. Lasonde called on Schakowsky to resign after videos released by Project Veritas Action appear to show Schakowsky’s husband talk about voter fraud.

Erica Snow, Assistant City Editor
October 20, 2016

Republican congressional candidate Joan McCarthy Lasonde called for U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Evanston) to resign at a press conference outside Schakowsky’s Evanston office Thursday.

Lasonde said Schakowsky was the “ringleader” of protests and riots that led to the cancellation of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s March 11 rally at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Lasonde referenced undercover videos released by the conservative advocacy site Project Veritas Action that appear to show Jan Schakowsky’s husband, political consultant Robert Creamer, discussing voter fraud.

The leaked videos also show Scott Foval, the former national field director for Americans United for Change, talk about hiring “mentally ill” and homeless people to protest at Trump rallies.

Surrounded by supporters on the sidewalk outside Schakowsky’s office at 820 Davis St., Lasonde said Schakowsky was either involved in or knew about the alleged incitement of violence at Trump rallies and didn’t do anything to stop it.

“If Schakowsky wasn’t part of the wrongdoing, she’d had to have made a huge effort to keep her head in the sand, and willful ignorance is no excuse,” Lasonde said. “Her resignation now is the first step to ensuring that violence will not be used as a means to stifle political opposition.”

In an emailed statement, Schakowsky criticized Lasonde for referencing the video made by conservative James O’Keefe, whom she called an “alt-right” activist.

“O’Keefe hired undercover operatives who tried to lure Democratic consultants into taking actions that were improper or illegal, but no one took the bait,” Schakowsky said in the email.

Foval was laid off from Americans United for Change on Wednesday. Creamer announced he was “stepping back” from his work for the presidential campaign Wednesday so as not to be a distraction from defeating Trump.

Creamer founded the organization Democracy Partners, which contracted Foval as an organizer. Lasonde said the two are guilty of committing voter fraud, inciting violence at Trump rallies, and Schakowsky must also be held responsible for either participating or failing to stop it.

In the videos, Foval allegedly explained how easy it is to cover up in-person voter fraud.

Schakowsky called the video a “manufactured and non-existent ‘scandal’” in the email.

O’Keefe’s Project Veritas Action has received criticism for attacking Democratic politicians and heavily editing their videos in a way many say is unethical. O’Keefe was convicted in 2010 for his involvement with a break-in to the office of a U.S. senator from Louisiana in an attempt to create false recordings.

“The discredited source of these videos, James O’Keefe, is a convicted criminal with a history of doctoring video to advance his ideological agenda,” said Donna Brazile, interim chair of the Democratic National Convention, in an email statement. “We are in the process of conducting an internal investigation to determine whether he and his cohorts committed any illegal activities in this well-funded operation.”

Creamer has also been convicted himself — he was sentenced to five months in prison in 2006 for bank fraud and a tax violation, a fact Lasonde referenced multiple times during the press conference as proof of Creamer’s alleged connection to voter fraud and violence at Trump rallies.

Trump referenced the videos during the third presidential debate Wednesday night, saying Creamer’s work as a political analyst for the Clinton campaign was linked to the violence at some of his rallies.

“Just like if you look at what came out today on the clips where I was wondering what happened with my rally in Chicago and other rallies where we had such violence,” Trump said at the debate. “(Hillary Clinton) is the one — and Obama — that caused the violence. They hired people. They paid them $1,500, and they’re on tape saying, ‘Be violent. Cause fights. Do bad things.’”

https://dailynorthwestern.com/2016/...raud-orchestrating-violence-at-trump-rallies/
 
While I agree there is no real clear patch to whistle-blowing, there are things you can do long before committing treason. Special Agent John Dodson who leaked fast and furious to congress is a good example.
 
While I agree there is no real clear patch to whistle-blowing, there are things you can do long before committing treason. Special Agent John Dodson who leaked fast and furious to congress is a good example.

What did Dodson do that Binney didn't try?
 
Jan Schakowsky Mentored Chicago Mob Linked Alexi Giannoulias

Flashback to the Chicago Reader December 2008:In mid-November, Alexi Giannoulias held a Sunday-morning news conference at Flashpoint Academy, a digital-arts school in the Loop, to announce that he was being endorsed for the U.S. Senate by Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky. It wasn't a surprising development—Schakowsky has been a mentor and a key ally to Giannoulias since his political debut in 2006, when he ran successfully for state treasurer—but the event was choreographed as if it were big news. Campaign workers greeted people in the lobby and directed them to the elevators a few steps away; others waited to catch them as they stepped off the elevators on the fifth floor. Dozens of chairs were set up in the room where the announcement was to be made, and a video camera was ready to capture it for YouTube.

By a few minutes past 11:30, the scheduled start time, about 20 of Giannoulias's supporters had assembled, including the campaign staffers and his mother. But the only media who'd shown up were me and a couple cameramen from local TV stations.

In strode a smiling Schakowsky and Cook County commissioner Larry Suffredin, followed by Giannoulias, a six-two, 33-year-old former basketball player and banking exec. Larry Suffredin is another Chicago politician with ties to Chicago Mob associate Fred Barbara of domestic terrorist fame. Did Alexi Giannoulias suggest Jan Schakowsky rent office space from Chicago mobster Michael "Jaws" Giorango?


https://nalert.blogspot.com/2010/02/jan-schakowsky-mentored-chicago-mob.html
 
Obama “All In” for Senate Candidate/Mob Banker Who Loaned $20 Mil to a Guy Named “
===========================================
Obama “All In” for Senate Candidate/Mob Banker Who Loaned $20 Mil to a Guy Named “
By Fred Dardick

August 3, 2010



President Obama has thrown his political weight behind Chicago mob banker and basketball buddy, Alexi Giannoulias, in a brazen attempt to help elect one of the sleaziest Democrat politicians around to his old Illinois Senate seat.

Last week Obama man David Plouffe held a conference call with reporters to reinforce that Obama was “all in” with his support for Illinois State Treasurer Giannoulias over Republican challenger Rep. Mark Kirk. While Plouffe spent much of his time bashing Kirk, “Congressman Kirk has shown himself to be a fan of fiction’‘, there was no mention of Giannoulias’ approval of $20 million in loans to Chicago mob figure Michael “Jaws” Giorango while he was Senior Loan Officer at Giannoulias family owned Broadway Bank.

Among other things, Mr. Jaws intended to use Broadway Bank money to build a casino that would provide not only jobs for the community, but also prostitution, loan sharking, drug trafficking and other lucrative “business” opportunities for a “made man” that would come naturally with owning such an operation.

Soon after Giannoulias approved one of the loans, Mr. Jaws was convicted of running a national prostitution ring and sent to prison. To be clear, I’m not accusing Mr. Jaws of wrongdoing (translation: please don’t hurt me!), only pointing out that he found himself one heck of a patsy in Giannoulias.

In 2006 Giannoulias described Mr. Jaws as “a very nice person” to the Chicago Tribune and rationalized to the AP, “If every time someone got arrested the bank threw them out, I think it would be a problem.”

Not surprisingly Giannoulias now denies any association with Mr. Jaws and insists the loans were made without his direct involvement, which would be a miraculous feat considering at the time Giannoulias’ job title was Senior Loan Officer and he has been quoted as saying “You have to understand that it was the family business – I did everything there.”

Democrat corruption not being very high on the Chicago news to do list, a local CBS reporter threatened Rep. Kirk for reminding voters of Giannoulias’ ties to organized crime: “Channel 2’s made a decision. We’re really not going to cover the Senate race, if it consistently only in your terms is about Broadway Bank. The bank’s been taken over by the government, Alexi’s been pilloried.”

Interestingly enough, being a mob banker is politically survivable in Chicago, especially when local news programs bury the story, as Giannoulias is currently leading in the polls by 2 points. However, this may not last as the 34-year-old Giannoulias has a long history of shady dealings that are finally making it to the light of day.

During Giannoulias’ time as Senior Loan Officer, Broadway Bank was transformed from a local south side stalwart, to a risky loan operator that financed not only Mr. Jaw’s burgeoning criminal empire, but shady real estate dealings throughout the City of Chicago.
Soon after Giannoulias’s departure in 2006, but while he still maintained an ownership stake, Broadway Bank loaned $22.75 million to convicted felon and Obama insider Tony Rezko to finance a condo development project that never got off the ground.

In 2007 and 2008, smelling blood in the water, the Giannoulias family cashed in over $70 million worth of dividends leaving the bank hopelessly under funded. Broadway Bank collapsed in April leaving the FDIC (taxpayers) on the hook for hundreds of millions in losses and the Giannoulias family, ironically enough, eligible for an additional $10-15 million in tax refunds.

https://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/tag/chicago-mob-ties-to-giannoulias/
 
Back
Top