- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 55,921
- Reaction score
- 27,198
Thank you. You could watch the Edmonds video and help more.
We have a sitting Representative that is acting as a foreign agent.
But she's cute as fuck and I can't watch video at work.
Thank you. You could watch the Edmonds video and help more.
We have a sitting Representative that is acting as a foreign agent.
But she's cute as fuck and I can't watch video at work.
Yes, and in 2000, another representative was added to the list, Jan Schakowsky, the Democratic congresswoman from Illinois. Turkish agents started gathering information on her, and they found out that she was bisexual. So a Turkish agent struck up a relationship with her. When Jan Schakowsky’s mother died, the Turkish woman went to the funeral, hoping to exploit her vulnerability. They later were intimate in Schakowsky’s townhouse, which had been set up with recording devices and hidden cameras. They needed Schakowsky and her husband Robert Creamer to perform certain illegal operational facilitations for them in Illinois. They already had Hastert, the mayor, and several other Illinois state senators involved. I don’t know if Congresswoman Schakowsky ever was actually blackmailed or did anything for the Turkish woman.
You'd think that this would be something people would have heard of, but apparently, the reason no one has is that it's crazy and, BTW, not even what Edmonds claims.
Here's Edmonds:
Great story! Doesn't really sound plausible, though, and the lack of any follow-up suggests that there was nothing to it. I'm guessing this is another Karen Hudes-type situation.
I do not know about that lady but in regards to Snowden he violated a very important rule.
In a time of war it is not the truth that matters but only victory.
No one will care if the NSA or whoever recorded some phone calls in 100 years.
However, everyone will care if the US loses the war on terror.
Jack don't you think her pedophile claims against hastert being proven, should give her the benefit of the doubt?
Her claims appear to be a mixture of true-ish stuff and false stuff.
You didn't address the fact that your claim is very different from hers.
Watch the binney video, and he will explain that the program "Thin Tread" was more effective, and constitutional.
Your choice of win the war on terror, or violate the Constitution, is a false dichotomy.
How? When has the US ever won a war without violating parts of constitution? A war always makes its own laws.
The constitution is an over 200-year-old document. How can a 200-year old document be the basis or rulebook for fighting a war in 2017 a completley different time period.
The dynamic the war on terror has taken never in the slightest occurred to the people that wrote the constitution.
Destroying the fabric of the rule of law, and the document that gives you your right to bear arms, to free speech, when there is no need to, is losing the war, not winning it.
We're not at war. Stop being histrionic. The war on drugs isn't an actual war either.I feel like I am derailing your thread here, if I do so sorry that wasn't my intention.
Anyway, you don't destroy the rule of law or your rights to bear arms. It is just that with the nature of the war on terror collecting people's data is a very important factor to win this war.
Because that is how the enemy recruits soldiers and spreads its message. It is their greatest weapon.
It is something we have never see before. And we will have to adapt to this kind of warfare. It would not be the first time that certain aspects of your constitution have been found to not be appropriate anymore for the current time period. And certainly not the firs time the constitution was violated in order to win a war.
It's all good. The original thread was about Snowden.I feel like I am derailing your thread here, if I do so sorry that wasn't my intention.
Anyway, you don't destroy the rule of law or your rights to bear arms. It is just that with the nature of the war on terror collecting people's data is a very important factor to win this war.
Because that is how the enemy recruits soldiers and spreads its message. It is their greatest weapon.
It is something we have never see before. And we will have to adapt to this kind of warfare. It would not be the first time that certain aspects of your constitution have been found to not be appropriate anymore for the current time period. And certainly not the firs time the constitution was violated in order to win a war.
While I agree there is no real clear patch to whistle-blowing, there are things you can do long before committing treason. Special Agent John Dodson who leaked fast and furious to congress is a good example.