Elections Democrat in CT commit actual insurrection

You brought up over turn convictions in a thread about voter fraud. The point you have argued about the court doesn't really matter when evidence hasn't been presented to prove the claims. To over turn convictions it takes evidence. Wide spread voter fraud claims made by politicians lack actual evidence to support such claims. You're so stuck believing that your argument is bullet proof that you can't continue on in a discussion outside of your original point.
I brought up the court is wrong sometimes. You can't disagree. What are you arguing for?
 
I brought up the court is wrong sometimes. You can't disagree. What are you arguing for?
Were the courts wrong about the stolen election?
 
Again this isn't about Trump. It's about taking a court decision as being 100 percent right and it's never wrong. Obviously the court system has been wrong many times..


well i guess the court system must be the problem here. the court system is the reason why they didn't overturn the election and install donald trump as dictator. how dare they ignore all of the allegations of crime that was never made. shame on them for ignoring all of the evidence that was never put forward. they should have just tossed out millions of votes, printed off those 11,500 votes in georgia, thrown out the election, and installed donald trump as dictator, just because donald trump lost the election and got his feelings hurt.

and when the courts wouldn't bow down to donald trump's reasonable demands, and nobody else other than a bunch of fake electors and other sacrificial lambs were willing to grow a spine and stand up for what the quadruple-indicted, twice-impeached, election-losing fraudster and rapist believes is right, his own vice president stabbed america in the back. january 6'th, never forget.
 
Last edited:
You brought up over turn convictions in a thread about voter fraud. The point you have argued about the court doesn't really matter when evidence hasn't been presented to prove the claims. To over turn convictions it takes evidence. Wide spread voter fraud claims made by politicians lack actual evidence to support such claims. You're so stuck believing that your argument is bullet proof that you can't continue on in a discussion outside of your original point.


hey now, the evidence is coming. there's mountains and mountains of evidence of the election being stolen, and a crackhead pillow salesman is the only one one on this galaxy who is worthy of laying eyes on any of it. and you see, all the evidence has all been coming in so fast that we can barely keep up!

people are saying that this evidence is far too damning to bring to court. it would reveal all of the hidden secrets of the universe that the world doesn't need to be made aware of. the kind of mystical treasures and evidence of crimes so well-hidden that a blind man wouldn't even be able to find on hunter biden's laptop. the kind of evidence that you wouldn't be able to refute, even if the crackhead pillow salesman doubled down and offered you $10 million to prove him wrong!

don't you worry my dude, the kraken is coming. any day now. trust the plan. just a few more of your patriotic donations to the Save America Team will make all of the difference in the world. and triple check to make sure you have checked the box to enable recurring donations, otherwise i will have no other choice but to tell donald trump that you have deserted him for socialism and the radical left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LMP
Dispute the details or shut the fuck up.


thats basically the tl;dr version of what i've been trying to say to this chud

we're now officially on 1095 kraken-less days. big claims require big evidence. put up or shut up motherfuckers.
 
<BidenShutIt>

I'm one of those '2020 seems very sketchy' politicos, but all of these small-scale election cheating proves nothing.

There's been election cheating for as long as there's been elections.

Shocking, isn't it? That scumbag politicians and even judges aren't the pillars of morality they're supposed to be? Who knew?

But making big deals out of these local situations as if they're examples of what supposedly happened in 2020, which would be 1,000 times bigger (in just a few states)?

Not buying it.

cry more. If they, election officials in this case, are willing to do this in a democrat primary. Imagine what the same people did when literally hitler was on the ballot. Someone all the media for years said was evil hitler.

Why was this case heard, but trump and his followers can’t be heard when similar evidence is shared??

sorry you are weak and support a two tiered system




Explain again why a judge looked at this case, with similar evidence, but this evidence was dismissed every time with trump, literally the exact same evidence, actually overwhelmingly more. Hundreds of affidavits, hundreds of hours of video of people stuffing ballot boxes and improperly handling ballots, missing records of proper ballot handling, hundred of thousands of ballots with no verification, etc.

that somehow is all not evidence, but this is, wow
 
Last edited:
cry more. If they, election officials in this case, are willing to do this in a democrat primary. Imagine what the same people did when literally hitler was on the ballot. Someone all the media for years said was evil hitler.

Why was this case heard, but trump and his followers can’t be heard when similar evidence is shared??

sorry you are weak and support a two tiered system




Explain again why a judge looked at this case, with similar evidence, but this evidence was dismissed every time with trump, literally the exact same evidence, actually overwhelmingly more. Hundreds of affidavits, hundreds of hours of video of people stuffing ballot boxes and improperly handling ballots, missing records of proper ballot handling, hundred of thousands of ballots with no verification, etc.

that somehow is all not evidence, but this is, wow



evidence is shared in court, and i would like to know what the courts have had to say about this so-called evidence. so can you just do me just one favor and provide me with the docket number for at least one of the cases where this video was submitted by the plaintiff?

i want to look that up through PACER and see just what the courts have to say about it. i'm not interested in the opinions of newsmax and faux noise propagandists, space karen, and convicted felons who scam rubes for a living. i'm guessing that this exclusive video footage was taken from the 2022 fanfiction griftpiece called 2000 Mules, years after the election was already over. and much like everything else in that fanfiction movie, i'm also guessing that this video was never actually submitted to any courtroom as any evidence of crime.
 
Last edited:
damn. my bad, as it turns out, that that clip actually was a part of 2000 mules and donald trump's spokesbimbo liz harrington was drip feeding the rubes with it and a handful of other clips to hype up their upcoming movie.

my bad. disregard. for a second i thought i might have been looking at some kind of evidence of crime that might have been submitted to the courts during donald trump's election litigation. turns out it was just a bunch of promotional hype for their 2000 mules movie which has long been debunked.

fuck sakes. i guess i'll just have to keep waiting here on kraken watch.
 
Last edited:
thats basically the tl;dr version of what i've been trying to say to this chud

we're now officially on 1095 kraken-less days. big claims require big evidence. put up or shut up motherfuckers.
So again why are you arguing with me? Please QUOTE my original post to show me? I instantly made this about Trump right? So show me or shut up.
 
Were the courts wrong about the stolen election?
Probably not but stuff like this can turn out to be wrong because I've seen the courts be wrong before or would you disagree courts have never been wrong?
 
Dispute the details or shut the fuck up.
Dispute what details? Courts can be wrong? You didn't know that? Let me guess since I made the comment it's me defending Trump in some sort of way since you are sick in the head.
 
So again why are you arguing with me? Please QUOTE my original post to show me? I instantly made this about Trump right? So show me or shut up.


bro you made a shit ass nonsensical apples to oranges analogy and i'm not here to debate over a bunch of people who have been convicted by a judge or jury of their peers for crimes they didnt commit. at least in that situation some kind of acceptable evidence was put forward in court. yeah there are people who get wrongfully convicted, just as much as there are people wrongfully acquitted. i agree with you too, it happens. but so what?

trying to make bold allegations of shit while providing no facts or evidence to support your claims, or not even making those actual allegations in a courtroom at all is not the same as a bunch of people who have been wrongfully convicted of crimes. those people are on the other side of the courtroom. they are not the ones making the allegations. they are the ones who are defending the allegations being made against them, and whatever evidence that was put forward to prosecute them. they dont have to prove shit. they just have to cast enough doubt in front of their peers to convince them that they aren't guilty of the allegation being made against them, and yes, sometimes under certain circumstances the system doesnt always work out the way that it should.
 
Last edited:


"Judge orders new election after video shows possible ballot stuffing"

as if this didnt happen 2020 on a wide scale. Ballot harvesting exists and it's illegal in almost every country in the world (eg. Canada, UK, Aus), but in the USA, it's been made legal in many states.

fair play to democrats, if you aint cheating, you aint trying.
 
Fake News. When Joe Louis won the Heavyweight Championship in 1853 he was registered in all 50 states to vote... and each knockout he has is counted as a 1000 votes. :)
 
Back
Top