Yes, absolutely. That was what I was trying to say, sorry if I was unclear. I think a lot of pure MT strategies can work in spots in MMA, you just don't have people who A. have that skillset and B. want to fight that way. Most MMA in American implicitly comes from a wrestling/grappling or Dutch/K1 KB base, in the sense that most of the head coaches come from those disciplines and that's how they teach people to fight. I can't think of any prominent head coaches who have really deep traditional Muay Thai backgrounds (Rafael Cordeiro maybe?). The meta game just doesn't include much in the way of trad Nak Muay strategies, though I think that's probably just a matter of time. If I had to pick any area of MMA that I thought was ripe for serious change in how people approach it in the near future, it would be the clinch and I think the most likely direction of change is moving away from using such a wrestling focused clinch and using much more of a MT, striking oriented clinch.
Funny thing, the only guy I can think of who uses a pseudo-MT strategy consistently is a guy with as far as I know no traditional Muay Thai training: Jon Jones. Not saying he fights like a Nak Muay, but if you watch his game it's primarily kicks at distance, limited punching, lots of elbow, knees, and upper body throws from the clinch, and a long guard. The technical repertoire he uses is not MT at all but the notion of using your length to keep guys off you with kicks and a long guard and then instead of staying in punching range immediately closing the distance all the way to the clinch from which you strike and dump more so than wrestle is very much a MT strategy. Just a thought I've been kicking around.