BBC Racist video " the white race is the most violent and oppressive force of nature on earth."

yeah but the difference is Dolezal doesnt have any black ancestry. so its not the same thing.

anyway, its not just racists. White people in general didnt and don't accept other mixed races as one of their own. Why should they? If they want to define whiteness on their terms that is their decision. That doesnt make them racist. Why should I be selfish and claim to be able to speak for them, as one of them when they don't consider me such? There really isnt any good principle in doing that. Its usually people who identify as mixed who have a less strong identity because they have no clear connection to either group. I choose to make a distinct decision and pick a side instead of playing the who am I?, noone accepts me poor me game. That has alot more principle and strength to me than any undefined mixed race identity.
So you think denying the blood of one of your parents is principled or strong??? And you keep repeating the same thing about what "white people" accept or don't accept as if that's supposed to determine how you look at yourself. Letting others define you is not principled or strong either.
Besides race is a social construct as I said before, and there is no real reason why race has to mean anything if people don't want it to. It doesnt mean anything without culture so you are simply arguing for one cultural interpretation of ancestry that is just as arbitrary as any other. People have been invading other groups since the beginning of time and you don't see them repping every foreigner who has banged one of their bitches. If you happen to believe we're all from africa why does it even matter? do you celebrate your ancient african ancestry?
You talking out of both sides of your mouth. You claim that you've "picked a side", yet here you are trying to destroy the whole construct. Which is it?

History is important in regards to ethnic and cultural identity and it is only certain groups of people who have been culturally neutered through marxist propaganda that down play its importance. So you'll have to excuse me if I don't feel the need to tie myself to other groups like that. Honestly if history doesnt mean anything then why does blood have to either? denying the history of ones people is what is really weak and selfish because it undermines the group identity for the sake of the individual. This extremely recent position among white people that you hold is for the benefit of white people, in order to undermine and fracture non white group identities into a more malleable homogeneous one tied to white people.
if you feel the need to "pick", then denying the history of your people it is exactly what you're doing, right?
 
White Culture is simply the most dangerous and violent.
Holy shit, who the fuck told you that a skin color has a culture?? Jesus Christ. I bet you think there's a such thing as black culture too, right.
 
...White culture has very violent tendencies.

Im not racist...Im talking about culture....How can I be racist against Culture? A White person can be a great person but white people culture is violent.
Oh look, the dummy that thinks skin color can have a culture.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh look, the dummy that thinks skin color can have a culture.

I mean "white" is too broad of a category to have any kind of mono-culture.......
but ethnicity + proximity almost always creates a culture. Sometimes it's a nation-state like Germans in Germany, and sometimes its a sub population like Irish-americans in Boston.
 
I mean "white" is too broad of a category to have any kind of mono-culture.......
but ethnicity + proximity almost always creates a culture. Sometimes it's a nation-state like Germans in Germany, and sometimes its a sub population like Irish-americans in Boston.
The white prison gang still isn't white culture. And German culture isn't white culture either..
 
You must be a low information White Knight
It was a serious question. I dont understand why you need to be told again when he already stated the reason. What am i missing from this? Connect the dots.
 
I only made it 43 seconds into that video but I still feel like I should be able to sue you somehow
 
@Jack V Savage Didn't you say before that BBC is part of the mainstream media? Didn't you also say there is no anti-white bias in the mainstream media?
 
It’s almost as some entity wants to create disharmony in Western society by playing groups against each other on something as flimsy as melanine levels.

If they truly want to create a functioning multi cultural society, the best way to do that is to not polarize and create mistrust along racial lines.
 
Whites came to America aggresively to kill the natives...Lets no pretend that they were buddies but unfortunately the natives died.

Whites didn't go to America for the purpose of killing natives. Many were escaping religious persecution.
The killing was just an unfortunate consequence of multiculturalism.


I never said anybody else is an innocent victim, I clearly said whites were more dangerous, White culture has very violent tendencies.

Every culture has violent tendencies. The thing that makes some cultures more dangerous is their relative competence when compared to less capable groups.
At this point, those who descend from historically incompetent cultures are expressing their inherited envy of those who are the products of capable cultures.

Those cultures are not based on skin colour - it's pretty accidental that it appears that way.
 
Force of destructive nature sounds pretty bad ass. I'll take it.
 
@Jack V Savage Didn't you say before that BBC is part of the mainstream media? Didn't you also say there is no anti-white bias in the mainstream media?

So fucking dumb.

There was a 15 minute segment where they have a speaker to to suggest an idea, then debate it. They've had all political stripes, figures and ideologies on, discussed and debated.

If you think this is some kind of anti white propaganda, you are irredeemably stupid.
 
Whites didn't go to America for the purpose of killing natives. Many were escaping religious persecution.
The killing was just an unfortunate consequence of multiculturalism.




Every culture has violent tendencies. The thing that makes some cultures more dangerous is their relative competence when compared to less capable groups.
At this point, those who descend from historically incompetent cultures are expressing their inherited envy of those who are the products of capable cultures.

Those cultures are not based on skin colour - it's pretty accidental that it appears that way.

Don't feed the troll.
 
It’s almost as some entity wants to create disharmony in Western society by playing groups against each other on something as flimsy as melanine levels.

If they truly want to create a functioning multi cultural society, the best way to do that is to not polarize and create mistrust along racial lines.

Is the fact the BBC had this content on a debate show evidence of this? Seems more like outrage porn to me.
 
So fucking dumb.

There was a 15 minute segment where they have a speaker to to suggest an idea, then debate it. They've had all political stripes, figures and ideologies on, discussed and debated.

If you think this is some kind of anti white propaganda, you are irredeemably stupid.
So they had someone on who claimed that "the black race is the most violent and oppressive force of nature on earth"? Please point me to that episode.
 
So they had someone on who claimed that "the black race is the most violent and oppressive force of nature on earth"? Please point me to that episode.

I didn't say that, perhaps address what I posted.

If the show had an EDL member or right winger, is that also BBC propaganda too?
 
Back
Top