Crime Another Harvard plagiarism scandal - this time it's the chief diversity commissar

Do you believe cases of plagiarism are common in the DEI educators sector ?


  • Total voters
    47
Disagree again that white women are toward the bottom of the totem pole. They shit on white men just as much, if not more, than others. And elevate themselves. They are the single group that have historically benefitted from affirmative action the most out of ANY group or race. That is a verifiable fact (through data) and not an opinion.

Even all the diversity initiatives are at the behest of super liberal white women.



But ultimately it is about quality. Because if the black coach doesn't get wins, they get fired.

If the black coach gets more wins than a white coach, they're more qualified. Sports is the ultimate meritocracy.

I call BS that any sports team is hiring an inferior black coach simply for diversity. Winning is far too important.

Ok, I can accept your last statement as fact. Winning is the only thing that matters, but if they can do it with a minority coach, even better. I disagree that white women are not just above white men ir I guess Asian men. And yes, white women have benefited from aa. But right now, if you have a white woman and a black woman or better yet, a black trans woman with similar experience and quality, the white woman is the last considered imo. There is still def a wage/salary gap though. My wife is a dean of the largest university in my area. She has more experience than many of her male counterparts. In the university, She is in charge of the most buildings, most staff, most students of all majors, she has the highest budget-yet she makes less than the male deans and especially the football coach.

She runs biology, chemistry, math, physics-anything having to do with science. She also started several new majors, created nursing and speciality clinics, and is basically a bad ass. She has also gotten several million dollar plus grants. She has also been there for 19 years. But some of the people she supervises make more than her. One of the physicians assistant instructors makes about 20k more than her. Doesn’t even have a terminal degree-just a masters and is a certified PA. She is currently interviewing for the open provost job. Despite all her qualifications, experience, running the most majors and students (by a huge margin), but if she makes the final round and has to go against a minority, she will not get the position. Her and I know this.

And yes, white women that are liberal are shooting themselves in the foot and throwing white males under the double decker bus being driven by a less qualified minority driver because she is a blind, deaf, transgendered, vegan unicorn.
 
She runs biology, chemistry, math, physics-anything having to do with science. She also started several new majors, created nursing and speciality clinics, and is basically a bad ass. She has also gotten several million dollar plus grants. She has also been there for 19 years. But some of the people she supervises make more than her. One of the physicians assistant instructors makes about 20k more than her. Doesn’t even have a terminal degree-just a masters and is a certified PA. She is currently interviewing for the open provost job. Despite all her qualifications, experience, running the most majors and students (by a huge margin), but if she makes the final round and has to go against a minority, she will not get the position. Her and I know this.

If some of the people she supervises makes more than her, she should ask for a raise. Men are typically much more likely to ask for a raise and much more aggressive in negotiating salaries.

As for making less than the football coach, that is the case with many universities. Because the football programs typically brings in a shit ton of revenue. It's not sexism, but simple economics.

Regarding going against a minority candidate - perhaps this issue is more stark because it's a university setting. But in the regular workforce, white women have the most advantage still. They typically get paid more than minority candidates.
 
If some of the people she supervises makes more than her, she should ask for a raise. Men are typically much more likely to ask for a raise and much more aggressive in negotiating salaries.

As for making less than the football coach, that is the case with many universities. Because the football programs typically brings in a shit ton of revenue. It's not sexism, but simple economics.

Regarding going against a minority candidate - perhaps this issue is more stark because it's a university setting. But in the regular workforce, white women have the most advantage still. They typically get paid more than minority candidates.

Being a state university, raises are very tough to get. That’s why she seeks a presidential or provost job. I don’t want to move at all, but we may have to in order for her to make more money. She still more than doubles my salary, lol. It seems we agree on a lot. I do agree that white women wield more power then white men, but I disagree that white women are anywhere near the prestige of having say, a black female in a higher role. Black women are in the power position atm in both influence and hire ability.

As for the influence, look at 2020 as an example. Black women were pushed and celebrated for “leading the social reckoning” and even credited highly with electing biden. Whether accurate or not (I lean the latter, especially in electing biden) but if you had to lead a protest in 2020, the pole position went to black women, followed by black men.

Hell, white people were told to protest but take a back seat everywhere. At that time, I was fresh out of retirement. I took a job as a youth crisis response team member. In that very long six months, it was right smack in the middle of the pandemic, so everything was remote- I had to attend a fucking shit ton of zoom conferences. It made me sick because it was so fucking focused on white people, ESPECIALLY white men, taking a back seat. I had to attend several conferences that focused on “being an ally in the fight for social justice.” I took notes and pictures of the slides because I didn’t think people would believe me when I told them how bad it was.

I spent an 8 hour day zooming a conference on how to elevate black voices and specifically told to “yield my white privilege” and wait for black people, especially women,to speak first and last. To allow them to come up with solutions and give them all the credit for any team ideas or accomplishments.

I got super pissed off when they spent one of the hour long sections to specifically discuss what to do, as an ally, in the fight to protect black lives and voices when dealing with police. I watched and listened in horror as I was told it was my duty to the human race to film any and all interactions with police when a person of color was being detained or even traffic stops. I was instructed to announce “I am recording this interaction for the safety of black bodies and voices and will report and post this incident.” Then, to my horror, we had “break-out groups” in which you were assigned to a group to discuss various issues. Of course, a poc was appointed as the leader of the group and to present our findings to the conference at the end. In one break out group, I kept my shit on silent and if I was given the choice, I would have kept my camera off but we were instructed to keep both active and to participate (by my supervisor).

. I was specifically addressed by the group leader and asked “as a privileged white male(I was the only one) what are you prepared to do to protect black bodies from police violence and are you prepared to get in between a poc and a police officer and to protect them even if it causes you to get arrested and to truly be an ally.” I initially said I would like to remain silent. She kept prodding and finally, I said that I might observe, but I wasn’t sacrificing myself or my freedoms to interject myself into a situation that I didn’t know all the facts. She then told me to accept the challenge of discussion. I then told the group that if I saw something truly disturbing, I would probably get involved to protect any person’s life but I also said that if I saw a police officer getting attacked or struggling with a suspect, I was helping the cop. She then said “but you don’t know that the cop isn’t violating a poc’s rights simply because they can and you probably don’t understand the dynamics involving cops and poc or understand what initiated the interaction or the ramifications of what police violence does to poc and their communities.” I then told her that I knew way more than she could imagine. She then stated “ sorry to point out the obvious, but you’re a white male that benefits directly and indirectly from maintaining the status quo.”

I finally dropped the bomb and told them I was a retired cop and when I said I wasn’t interjecting myself into a situation I didn’t understand, you told me it was my duty, but then you said I should until I stated I would help a cop being attacked and you told me that I shouldn’t interject myself into a situation I didn’t understand. I said you don’t see the hypocrisy in that.

She told me I don’t understand the trauma caused by police violence, especially because I was a cop. I then stated that maybe she didn’t understand the violence in their own community and how that threatens poc more than cops ever could. I also mentioned how I had been shot at by a poc and in my 18 years, I had responded to dozens of murders and probably 100 shootings and there was never a white suspect and only a few white victims. She actually told me I needed to check myself and my privilege.

At this point, my supervisor got a call from her supervisor and was directed to tell me to apologize log out of the conference. my supervisor told me I could go home if I wanted. I was so pissed off I was almost in tears. I quit the next week.

The regional director of the company called me at home after I quit and told me they put a lot of money in training me and invested a lot of time in me. She admitted I was good at responding to calls(the few calls we got to respond to peoples homes) but I had a lot to learn about social work. I told her I learned enough in that one conference to know I wanted nothing to do with socialism work. She tried to correct me that it wasn’t socialism and it was honorable and honest work.

It was such a disgusting work and life experience.
 
People of all races/genders who cheat get booted from academia. Here are some examples: Francesca Gino, from Harvard (white female). Diederik Staple, from Tilburg (white male), Brian Wansink, from Cornell (white male), Nicole Coleman, from Pitt (white female). This was never in doubt for Claudine, she gets a pass and keeps her job as professor. Whither white privilege?

There are scads of black people in academia in high positions with real jobs who got there honestly. They are definitely not all DEI positions. When DEI positions are filled with cheaters, however, the cause of racial justice is horribly undermined.

What does any of this have to do with Claudine? She was never determined to be a cheater or DEI.
 
You constantly crying about "woe is me - poor black people" is as tiresome as the "woe is me - poor white people" schtick MAGA morons do. I'm not black or white and I'm getting real tired of race hustlers.

You were the one complaining that Claudine Gay resigned due to being black. No it wasn't. It was so freaking obvious it was her comments on the Jewish issue. But to you, everything is about being black. You have blinders on.

Not everything is about being black.

Weird how I slowly and carefully describe my position in this thread and you still managed to get it wrong.

Racism drove Rufo to do the thirty year deep dive to scrape up all the allegations they needed to make their case. Rufo doesn't care about antisemitism, his target is DEI (which she isn't but that doesn't matter).

There is no question Claudine had to resign, someone in that position needs to be beyond reproach. I agreed with her when she said the search was driven entirely by racism, because it obviously was, but that doesn't matter. She still had to resign.

I'm going to keep on addressing race issues and you can refute my points if you're so inclined. This is a discussion forum.
 
Ideological subversion.

It's painfully obvious, but people just don't want to see it because "herp derp you're a CTer"!"

Or maybe because despite the fact laws are in place to combat racism, it's almost impossible to ensure they're enforced.

I suspect diversity officers are mostly ornamental and have very little power.
 
Weird how I slowly and carefully describe my position in this thread and you still managed to get it wrong.

Racism drove Rufo to do the thirty year deep dive to scrape up all the allegations they needed to make their case. Rufo doesn't care about antisemitism, his target is DEI (which she isn't but that doesn't matter).

There is no question Claudine had to resign, someone in that position needs to be beyond reproach. I agreed with her when she said the search was driven entirely by racism, because it obviously was, but that doesn't matter. She still had to resign.

I'm going to keep on addressing race issues and you can refute my points if you're so inclined. This is a discussion forum.

she went on people's radars because of anti-semitism. then they looked into her work and thank god they did because she deserved to go. digging into her work got her rightfully shit-canned and highlighted harvard's discriminatory practices (both in hiring and when selecting prospective students), and it highlighted the utter failure of leftist DEI policies.

nothing "racist" about firing scum and highlighting scum policy.
 
Weird how I slowly and carefully describe my position in this thread and you still managed to get it wrong.

Racism drove Rufo to do the thirty year deep dive to scrape up all the allegations they needed to make their case. Rufo doesn't care about antisemitism, his target is DEI (which she isn't but that doesn't matter).

There is no question Claudine had to resign, someone in that position needs to be beyond reproach. I agreed with her when she said the search was driven entirely by racism, because it obviously was, but that doesn't matter. She still had to resign.

I'm going to keep on addressing race issues and you can refute my points if you're so inclined. This is a discussion forum.

If she had to resign due to racism why did the Penn State president who was white also resign right after that Congressional hearing with the Jewish question? Don't be naive.
 
I suspect diversity officers are mostly ornamental and have very little power.

Diversity
Inclusion
Equity

diversity means hiring someone who comes with non-hegemonic points of view (ie. communists). hiring a gay black conservative doesn't count, they have to be woke.

inclusion means including communist view points into policies.

the above two push us into the third......equity....aka communism.


diversity officers set the tone of an organization and are there to spread commie propaganda and get rid of anyone who opposes it. they don't do nothing.
 
I think they are all trash. If they were competent, they wouldn't need to use race to get a job.
 
If she had to resign due to racism why did the Penn State president who was white also resign right after that Congressional hearing with the Jewish question? Don't be naive.


If you had read my posts I wouldn't have to explain this again.

Liz Magill resigned because if she didn't, Penn State would have lost a hundred million dollars from one donor.

Harvard had Claudine's back until Rufo did a thirty year search into her history. This search is what I'm agreeing was racist, part of his attack on DEI. It had nothing to do with issues Rugo has no interest in.

It not only isn't a stretch, it's pretty obvious.
 
Diversity
Inclusion
Equity

diversity means hiring someone who comes with non-hegemonic points of view (ie. communists). hiring a gay black conservative doesn't count, they have to be woke.

inclusion means including communist view points into policies.

the above two push us into the third......equity....aka communism.


diversity officers set the tone of an organization and are there to spread commie propaganda and get rid of anyone who opposes it. they don't do nothing.

That's a pretty weird fantasy you have.

So gave up trying to find a straw man?
 
that's exactly what it means. "diverse" means woke and inclusion means giving woke the floor.




most of your posts are long justifications for woke policies.

So you don't know what a straw man is?
 
Back
Top