Crime Another Harvard plagiarism scandal - this time it's the chief diversity commissar

Do you believe cases of plagiarism are common in the DEI educators sector ?


  • Total voters
    47

Fox by the Sea

Lighthouse Keeper
Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
37,066
Reaction score
49,164

In what appears to become a chronic matter, another issue of plagiarism appears to have struck Harvard. This time it's the much respected function of chief diversity officer, it would appear, who among others has plagiarized stuff written by her husband, another diversity officer at another university.

is this the DEI maffia?
The grift must go on it seems, and become family business.

Harvard’s head of diversity accused of plagiarism​

Anonymous complaint against Dr Sherri Ann Charleston listed 40 falsification cases and a failure to properly cite her own husband’s work.
Harvard’s chief diversity and inclusion officer has become the latest member of staff to be accused of plagiarism, including a failure to properly cite her own husband’s study.
An anonymous complaint has listed at least 40 examples of alleged plagiarism by Sherri Ann Charleston dating from 2009, a decade before she joined Harvard, the Washington Free Beacon reported.
The allegations, which include failing to properly cite other academics’ work and lifting portions of text without quotation marks, come just weeks after Claudine Gay, Harvard University’s former president, resigned in the wake of a plagiarism scandal.
According to the Beacon, Dr Charleston, who is a historian, submitted a 2009 dissertation to the University of Michigan which included quotes or paraphrases from nearly a dozen scholars without proper attribution.

The complaint also alleges Dr Charleston ultimately took credit for a study that her husband, LaVar Charleston, wrote in 2012. He is now the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s deputy vice chancellor for diversity and inclusion.
That alleged act of plagiarism involved Dr Charleston recycling large portions of her husband’s earlier paper in a peer-reviewed article that she co-wrote in 2014, according to the complaint.
The article, published in the Journal of Negro Education, reportedly had the same findings, method and survey subject descriptions from her husband’s original work.
“The 2014 paper appears to be entirely counterfeit,” Peter Wood, the head of the National Association of Scholars and a former associate provost at Boston University, told the Beacon. “This is research fraud pure and simple.”
Steve McGuire, a former political theory professor at Villanova University, reviewed both the 2012 and 2014 papers.
“Sherri Charleston appears to have used somebody else’s research without proper attribution,” he told the Beacon.
The full complaint has been reportedly filed with Harvard, the University of Michigan and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Neither Dr Charleston nor her husband have commented on the allegations.
Dr Charleston was the chief affirmative action officer at the University of Wisconsin-Madison before switching to Harvard in August 2020, becoming its first chief diversity officer.
According to the Harvard Crimson, she was involved in the university’s presidential search process that resulted in the selection of Dr Gay in December 2022.
Dr Gay resigned on Jan 2 after facing allegations of plagiarism as well as criticism for her comments about anti-Semitism on campus.
Harvard’s board investigated the plagiarism complaints against the president in December and found “a few instances of inadequate citation” but “no violation of Harvard’s standard for research misconduct”.

below is the complaint detailing the alleged plagiarism examples:


 
Last edited:
I wonder how many people in academia are scared shitless now? A lot more defensive writing to come in the future. This seems to be more prevalent that initially thought but the algo made be stupid.

Edit : need to look into this more. Reusing your own data seems like a reach.
 
Last edited:
people that did false things fall for false things ? Not surprised
 
I think plagarism is very common because research is hard.

Anyone who is openly political should expect to recieve anonymous complaints of plagarism if they ever did anything close to plagarism because that is an easy way to remove them. Whether they lean left or right, expect to see a lot more plagarism complaints in the future.
 
people like that
giphy.gif
 
what an absolute joke, but of course corruption doesn't follow a party line or an ideology. I would say any institution that receives federal money should be more diligently scrutinized and held to a higher standard.
 
It's almost like Harvard isn't vetting anyone, and is just checking boxes or something...
I hope AI brings about an absolute whirlwind of true verification. The number of charlatans, especially in this type of bogus social sciences, must be enormous.
 
Back
Top