- Joined
- Sep 23, 2010
- Messages
- 23,112
- Reaction score
- 155
Anyone who had ever wrestled thought that.
Well Khabib's background is in combat Sambo and he's beaten many wrestlers as did Fedor
GSP himself credits that to his karate background, not his wrestling. Its because of his footwork, he's able to get in and out in a way that allows him to avoid takedowns and secure them. He said as much on Rogan's podcast and I remember Sherk years ago saying it was GSP's footwork that most impressed him.
If you look at most wrestlers, their takedown average is actually low because they often have to chain wrestle to get the guy to the ground. But GSP is different, he has a very high rate of success especially given how often he attempts takedowns and that's because of his unique skill set, coming form karate, that guys with a wrestling background don't have.
Its also similar to Judo and BJJ and even has elements of boxing.Well to be fair, Sambo is very similiar to wrestling.
To me it really was shocking... Before there was any ufc, i had always thought a black belt karate dude would fk anyone up in their path. I never thought a wrestler would be able to beat up any black belt in any discipline. Here we are now 25+ years later and yet like i said wrestlers are still dominating this sport. I first took interest in this sport because like so many others, i wanted to see what style of fighter would be the best style in a street fight and this was the closest thing to a street fight.
I wouldve never figured wrestling background would be the best of any mixed martial art to have. i wrestled right up until my senior year of highschool, so
maybe thats why i never really thought much about it.
I have heard this a lot can you elaborateThe only reason wrestlers dominate UFC is because of the UFC rules. They heavily favour wrestlers. The cage heavily favours wrestlers as well.
Keep going and you can include Dillashaw (wrestler), Hughes (wrestler), Jones (wrestler), Cain (wrestler), Cruz (wrestler). There are only so many fighters you can include in the greatest ever list that weren't wrestlers.Its just crazy to think that over all these years, wrestlers still take the cake as a whole in general.. So if you go to the best fighters of all time the majority are wrestlers.
1) GSP, Amazingly no wrestling background but yet won the majority of his fights by wrestling, even outwrestling decorated wrestlers.. Its still mind boggling to me.
2) Fedor, sambo
3) Mighty Mouse wrestling. Was finally beat by u guessed it a wrestler lol
4) DC, wrestler
5) Khabib, Sambo
* I can not have any cheaters on my all time p4p list.
After 25+ years, it is painfully apparent that fighters with a wrestling background have continued to dominate this sport. Who wouldve ever thought that wrestling which was never really considered a martial art, would be the absolute BEST background a fighter can have in any mma discipline.
Maybe in another 25 years, Fighters will develop a style that will be a nightmare for ALL fighters who excel at wrestling.
While this has been known for some time, it's not just wrestling, its wrestling practice at an early age that builds the mind to endure great degrees of discomfort.
While this is true in all sports, wrestling has always been the king.
It doesnt surprise me at all.
yup exactly right!Keep going and you can include Dillashaw (wrestler), Hughes (wrestler), Jones (wrestler), Cain (wrestler), Cruz (wrestler). There are only so many fighters you can include in the greatest ever list that weren't wrestlers.