Robbie Lawler has always opted for a more aggressive approach in his fighting style. Ever since his UFC return, he seemed to have polished his striking even more and showed great balance between counter striking and aggression up until the second Johnny Hendricks fight (If I remember correctly) Ever since their rematch, Lawler seemed to have dialed down his aggression and seemed to have leaned towards counter striking a bit more. I think this switch of style was even more evident in the Rory Macdonald fight. Sometimes I wonder how that fight would have gone differently (If it would have at all) if Robbie fought the way he has always fought. I feel like Robbie's decision to change up his style was detrimental and disadvantageous to his title defenses and I think that caused the discussions about him being the most underwhelming champion (Of course, I disagree). What do you guys think? What's your opinions?