• Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.

Elections You have to choose one to be your President, effective immediately

I don't think Harris is smart enough to be wildly corrupt. That would normally be bad, but in this case, I'm not sure..
What would the debate look like? Them both sucking Willie Brown's dick, then let the people decide?
 
Harris. Both are corrupt. But at least Harris is incompetent, like Trump, and will get significant push-back locking up gears for 3 more years. I don't think Harris is evil either like Hillary.
 
Last edited:
Hilary. Sectary of State experience alone puts her miles ahead.
Yeah, Hillary did a real bang up job killing the hero of Africa and turning Libya into a Jihad slave market... not to mention also person most responsible for Syrian war and 2015-2016 European immigration crisis. Obama should have never hired her dog whistling ass. Horrible person.
 
Last edited:
Why? People freaking out are kind of showing that they just view the presidency as kind of the talkshow host of the nation. When it comes to actual policy, things would obviously both be way better than they were under Trump, and similar to what we get under Biden.

Because regardless of the fact that the deep state steers major decisions on foreign policy, there is still the need for someone calm and measured to be POTUS.
Trump, Clinton, and Kamala Harris, are loose canons IMO. They are way too liberal on the use of the military.
Biden is actually calmer but I worry that he is senile (Biden 20-30 years ago would have made a much greater president than the state he is now).
701eb9210bcab734db6fb05a6d159767
 
harris. give someone new a chance. no more family dynasties.

but realistically, wouldnt vote. your vote doesnt count.
 
Because regardless of the fact that the deep state steers major decisions on foreign policy, there is still the need for someone calm and measured to be POTUS.
Trump, Clinton, and Kamala Harris, are loose canons IMO. They are way too liberal on the use of the military.
Biden is actually calmer but I worry that he is senile (Biden 20-30 years ago would have made a much greater president than the state he is now).
701eb9210bcab734db6fb05a6d159767


Youre still on this idiotic “deep state” kick I see. Aren’t you guys tired of this gimmick yet?
 
Because regardless of the fact that the deep state steers major decisions on foreign policy, there is still the need for someone calm and measured to be POTUS.
Trump, Clinton, and Kamala Harris, are loose canons IMO. They are way too liberal on the use of the military.
Biden is actually calmer but I worry that he is senile (Biden 20-30 years ago would have made a much greater president than the state he is now).

You have it backwards. In America, the left is less willing to engage in war. The "deep state" stuff is too silly to warrant a response. Come on, you know better than that.
 
You have it backwards. In America, the left is less willing to engage in war. The "deep state" stuff is too silly to warrant a response. Come on, you know better than that.


Can you imagine someone with a straight face saying “hillary Clinton is a loose canon?”

an old career moderate woman in a pants suit is now what the fringe right calls a “loose cannon.” Wasnt one of the major complaints about her is she is a status quo politician that will bring nothing new to the table? How is that a loose cannon?
 
Can you imagine someone with a straight face saying “hillary Clinton is a loose canon?”

an old career moderate woman in a pants suit is now what the fringe right calls a “loose cannon.” Wasnt one of the major complaints about her is she is a status quo politician that will bring nothing new to the table? How is that a loose cannon?

It's insane, but the guy is French so he might not be very familiar with her or the American scene.
 
You have it backwards. In America, the left is less willing to engage in war. The "deep state" stuff is too silly to warrant a response. Come on, you know better than that.

Countless political analysts agree that the "establishment" or "deep state" steer American foreign policy's big lines, regardless of whether Republicans or Democrats are in power. John Mearsheimer for instance. This is backed up by the fact that American foreign policy has been remarquable linear from Clinton to Obama all the way through Biden.

There is no "left" or "right" in America. Democrats are not "left" lmao.
 
Kamala because she is more incompetent and would have more difficult time getting anything done. I don't like either of their agendas but Hillary would be more likely to actually pass some of her bills and legislation, and probably a better shot at sticking around for a second term as well
 
Countless political analysts agree that the "establishment" or "deep state" steer American foreign policy's big lines, regardless of whether Republicans or Democrats are in power. John Mearsheimer for instance. This is backed up by the fact that American foreign policy has been remarquable linear from Clinton to Obama all the way through Biden.

There is no "left" or "right" in America. Democrats are not "left" lmao.


Deep state is science
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746

Makes ppl feel better if they think they have an input so denial is strong.
 
If there's a war on the horizon . Hillary. If somebody's needed to embarrass not only Women, but all Americans, Kamala.
 
Back
Top