• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

You Can Lose To Someone And Still Be A 'Better' Fighter Than They Are

Lockard The GOAT

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 7, 2016
Messages
3,562
Reaction score
0
Just because you lose to someone doesn't mean they're a better overall fighter than you. It means they were the better man that night, but if your overall resume and accomplishments are better (especially if you fought likewise opponents), then you are still the overall better fighter in my eyes.
 
where are you going with this TS ?
 
And that's why you prepare.

This happens with EVERYTHING, from college tests to sex and soccer games

Deal with it
 
Just because you lose to someone doesn't mean they're a better overall fighter than you. It means they were the better man that night, but if your overall resume and accomplishments are better (especially if you fought likewise opponents), then you are still the overall better fighter in my eyes.

Thank you! You speak the truth.
 
the term you are talking about is called "upset" and it happens all the time in professional sports

in MMA one good example is Sokojdou beating Arona and Lil Nog when both are clearly more accomplished fighters with better resumes
 
Last edited:
Sure. There's a reason so many trilogies go 2-1 and so few go 3-0. There's also something to be said for style matchups.
 
mcgregor-diaz-getty-ftr-030516jpg_1l105d2hoi4kd121my11xeox19.jpg
 
Of course. That's why we differentiate between comparing resumes and skills.
 
Just because somebody's dick is bigger than mine it doesn't mean they can fcuk better than I can.
 
Let me guess...your favorite fighter lost, you lashed out and got banned.
 
Everyone knows you are right, thread is unnecessary.

On a side note, Dietrich, what if you have a huge Wang and it's curved back at your sack. Your hypothesis has been exploded.
 
nah, I only care for winners
 
Back
Top