Now that Ronda's gone and Cyborg is becoming a superstar, you hate her now? Lmao. I love how Sherdog works.
Rousey had a "minority" of haters?or, you don't understand how sherdog works.
when Rousey was champ, her vocal minority of haters were more vocal. because it was timely then.
today, Cyborg's vocal minority of haters are more vocal. because it's timely now.
i hypothesize that you're not grokking how haters, timeliness or vocal minorities work on sherdog.
i used the term 'vocal minority', actually.Rousey had a "minority" of haters?
cyborg gets nothing but hate. people here were saying ronda had better wins and has a better resume. blinded by the "ufc" brand name.Now that Ronda's gone and Cyborg is becoming a superstar, you hate her now? Lmao. I love how Sherdog works.
I quoted the word that was relevant to my reply.i used the term 'vocal minority', actually.
let's say there's 100 people on sherdog, and the 10 haters make 60% of the posts. that model could be true in 2012 and today. except in 2012 those 10 haters didn't like Rousey, and today a totally different 10 haters dislike Cyborg.
i made no judgment on % of sherdoggers like or dislike either
i don't care. it had nothing to do with MY point, and i also don't care anyway.I quoted the word that was relevant to my reply.
What percentage of Sherdog posters do you believe actually liked Ronda Rousey?
or, you don't understand how sherdog works.
when Rousey was champ, her vocal minority of haters were more vocal. because it was timely then.
today, Cyborg's vocal minority of haters are more vocal. because it's timely now.
i hypothesize that you're not grokking how haters, timeliness or vocal minorities work on sherdog.
No, your point contained what's called a "premise." Such as "Bill won a lot of games after he stopped beating his wife." To ask that person how or why they believe Bill was a wife beater is not taking a point "out of context." It's questioning one of the underlying premises in someone's statement.i don't care. it had nothing to do with MY point, and i also don't care anyway.
and isn't quoting one word out of a meaningful phrase the very definition of taking something out of context?
well, maybe you're unfamiliar with the term. so be it.No, your point contained what's called a "premise." Such as "Bill won a lot of games after he stopped beating his wife." To ask that person how or why they believe Bill was a wife beater is not taking a point "out of context." It's questioning one of the underlying premises in someone's statement.
You do realise that sherdog is a website with many people of different opinions right? It's not just one entity with one opinion. It's not like people suddenly changed their mind about her. You're just seeing the opinions of different people. Stupid thread.Now that Ronda's gone and Cyborg is becoming a superstar, you hate her now? Lmao. I love how Sherdog works.
I'm not unfamiliar with any term in this case. You used the concept of a vocal minority exactly the way I interpreted it. Particularly when you hypothetically proposed that 10% of Ronda's fans were haters.well, maybe you're unfamiliar with the term. so be it.
That would actually be perfectly reasonable, since there must be some element of aggression for someone to be passive-aggressive.but you quoting "minority" from my "vocal minority" is akin to me calling someone "passive aggressive", and then you quoted me as calling someone "aggressive".
Ronda's whole career was based on lies, some of us have a very raw nerve for any false claims about her.well, maybe not that bad but the same ballpark.
i'm out. i'm sure you'll still disagree, and i doubt i'll respond when you do. cheers.