WR Meme thread V13

[Sir Galahad]

 

[Post Mortem]

@Cint back in his safe space lol

If anyone wants to see some brilliant self ownage check out this thread

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/a...fairs-secretary.3734155/page-2#post-139781151

Somebody has crawled into someone's head alright.

 

[Macktruckbuck]

That's not far from where i live

 

[DragRacer]

 

[Post Mortem]

 

[sangreporsangre]

 

[silicavaginitis]

Lol this kid has climbed inside your head and made himself nice a comfy

This meme thread has certainly got your jimmies rustled....you and rat posterior can't stop fucking crying long enough to post memes.

 

[Johnny Mac]

 

[Johnny Mac]

 

[Johnny Mac]

 

[Johnny Mac]

 

[ObamaPhoneLady]

I told you I'd reply back, didn't mean for the 30 hour delay.



I actually agree with this, but that is a separate issue.

Education systems within Prisons for low-level felons (under 15 years)?

*Thumbs Up*


What do you mean by 'complication?'



Open carry states still enforce no-gun-zones (schools).

What we're specifically discussing is lowering mass shootings at schools. If someone comes in armed and ready to paint the walls red with as many dead kids as possible, the shooter probably couldn't care less about the 'severe penalties.'

What no-gun-zones do, is prevent school personnel from being able to protect themselves and the students from an armed shooter.



Yes, many do.

And just like the Denver Theater Shooter, who specifically picked a theater that was labeled a gun-free-zone, potential shooters will simpily pick a school without any armed guards.

While many schools do have have armed gaurds, most don't. Even still, the shooters would first target the one armed guard per school and then it's a shooting gallery for all the kids being targets.

So, allowing any school personnel the choice to be armed, whether it is a teachers, jannitors, or principles and it being publicly known that every school employee throughout the nation could be armed would be an effective deterent.



No, but I do recognise the potential for confusion with non-school-personnel (parents & other visitors) being allowed to carry firearms into schools.

1 - If a shooting happens, the police would have trouble determining a potential good-samairatan parent with a gun, from the shooter.

2 - For open-carry states, a soon-to-be shooter with a handgun or rifle could walk into a school, legally.

My proposal would be - Keep schools being 'Gun Free Zones' for everyone BUT school personnel.

Rather than type a page and a half of how this would be an effective solution to problems each of us would bring up, are you open to this idea?

Never gotten a response on here to my plan to end school shootings. How about above about the 7th grade, kids just do school online from home? We allow college students to get degrees online now, so why not high school kids?

This should reduce school shootings by about 100%, give or take.

 

[Rational Poster]

I told you I'd reply back, didn't mean for the 30 hour delay.



I actually agree with this, but that is a separate issue.

Education systems within Prisons for low-level felons (under 15 years)?

*Thumbs Up*


What do you mean by 'complication?'



Open carry states still enforce no-gun-zones (schools).

What we're specifically discussing is lowering mass shootings at schools. If someone comes in armed and ready to paint the walls red with as many dead kids as possible, the shooter probably couldn't care less about the 'severe penalties.'

What no-gun-zones do, is prevent school personnel from being able to protect themselves and the students from an armed shooter.



Yes, many do.

And just like the Denver Theater Shooter, who specifically picked a theater that was labeled a gun-free-zone, potential shooters will simpily pick a school without any armed guards.

While many schools do have have armed gaurds, most don't. Even still, the shooters would first target the one armed guard per school and then it's a shooting gallery for all the kids being targets.

So, allowing any school personnel the choice to be armed, whether it is a teachers, jannitors, or principles and it being publicly known that every school employee throughout the nation could be armed would be an effective deterent.



No, but I do recognise the potential for confusion with non-school-personnel (parents & other visitors) being allowed to carry firearms into schools.

1 - If a shooting happens, the police would have trouble determining a potential good-samairatan parent with a gun, from the shooter.

2 - For open-carry states, a soon-to-be shooter with a handgun or rifle could walk into a school, legally.

My proposal would be - Keep schools being 'Gun Free Zones' for everyone BUT school personnel.

Rather than type a page and a half of how this would be an effective solution to problems each of us would bring up, are you open to this idea?

More guns is just a band aid. More guns means more potential incidents, intentional or accidental. It's just basic math.

If you really want to tackle gun violence and you need to address it at the source. Defending yourself against an active shooter is already too late. You've already failed many times before that point.

I don't want to ban guns, I want to create a society that people do not feel so threatened that they need them.

The Denver shooter wasn't possible because it was a gun free zone. The Denver shooter was possible because a crazy person was able to get his hands on a firearm. Society produced a broken person and we failed to address it properly.

Gun Free Zones and open carry laws are not solutions.

 

[Johnny Mac]

 

[Karp]

 

[Karp]

 

[sangreporsangre]

 

[sangreporsangre]

 

[Grok]

Happy Easter you godless heathens

 

[Sir Galahad]

That's not far from where i live

You're in Texas? Yeehaw! @Macktruckbuck