Social WR Lounge v249: I always forget what WPEM means.

[essie]

I like Reddit lol. You can curate your experience. There are lots of bad sub Reddits but that’s like saying you hate movies because there are bad ones.

unresolvedmysteries
zodiackiller
nbadraft
letsnotmeet
feminism
survivor
jonbenetramsey

all great subs

 

[Trotsky]

You are consistent Trotsky I have to respect that.

You do agree that is really shitty writing, though, right?

Trying to sound smart but instead sounding like a try-hard moran is Peterson's brand at this point.

 

[Gregolian]

@Gregolian Took us 3 1/2 hours to complete Fallen S.A.B.E.R GM. Wiped three separate time at the boss with his health sitting at like 10%. We did get it done, but I’m giving it a break for a week. That was taxing on my mental health.

I did Trials a bunch last weekend to get the shotgun and help clan mates get that one bounty done so I have barely touched the game this week

 

[essie]

You do agree that is really shitty writing, though, right?

Trying to sound smart but instead sounding like a try-hard moran is Peterson's brand at this point.

 

[Lord Coke]

You do agree that is really shitty writing, though, right?

Trying to sound smart but instead sounding like a try-hard moran is Peterson's brand at this point.

It could be better.

I answered your question now answer mine. In your view is a opinion or more often a dissent and/or a concurrence not a prohibited advisory opinion if it addresses issues not before the court even if their is an appropriate case or controversy in front of it. I'll get you into a writing mode by mentioning I thought of this while reading your favorite Justices' concurrence in finding the Trump twitter petition moot. Thomas went a little beyond the scope of the petition and I was thinking this is something that I've never thought of. And more to the point if the case is moot really what is the extra fluff for? I get that no one is going to do anything about it but article three is pretty clear and if any part of a opinion goes beyond the scope of the case then that seems to be going beyond what article three allows. What do you think?

 

[irish_thug]

What do you guys thing of the new avatar I haven't decided whether i am going to keep it

I know @KnightTemplar will approve.

 

[Trotsky]

I don't actually think he hates trans people (or women, the poor, gays, etc.). First and foremost, I think he's just stupid. Of course, plenty of his followers hate those groups of people.

It could be better.

I answered your question now answer mine. In your view is a opinion or more often a dissent and/or a concurrence not a prohibited advisory opinion if it addresses issues not before the court even if their is an appropriate case or controversy in front of it. I'll get you into a writing mode by mentioning I thought of this while reading your favorite Justices' concurrence in finding the Trump twitter petition moot. Thomas went a little beyond the scope of the petition and I was thinking this is something that I've never thought of. And more to the point if the case is moot really what is the extra fluff for? I get that no one is going to do anything about it but article three is pretty clear and if any part of a opinion goes beyond the scope of the case then that seems to be going beyond what article three allows. What do you think?

Sorry, I'm not sure I get what you're asking. It's a "prohibited advisory opinion" insofar that it's not binding. But that won't stop Thomas from referring to it in a binding context when the issue is before the Court and acting like it provides a precedent in the Court's thinking. He does that all the time. I like to imagine that he first pores over volumes of Supreme Court cases looking for opinions that are as dogshit stupid as his own and then just has to settle for citing his own dissents. But I know that dumbass doesn't read shit in his spare time. Since, in addition to being famously stupid, he's also famously lazy.

On that topic, someone in a lawyer group I'm in posted Clarence Thomas's face onto this painting and it was hilarious.

 

[Islam Imamate]

T-Swift sticking it to the man @BEER

A true Goddess among mortals.

Next.