- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,963
- Reaction score
- 35,164
what did you guys finally settle on, in trms of the definition?
There wasn't one. I thought it was a stupid distraction because we didn't differ on the substance, and our real disagreement was about whether the thing we're talking is good or not. I think it's relevant that the push started in response to the president being mad about being fact-checked, as I think it sets a terrible precedent for the gov't to [take over/destroy the business model of] a company in response to the president being mad about being fact-checked. I believe in freedom of speech. He thinks that defenders of the president made a good point, and that we have to shut down some people's freedom of speech in order to get other benefits.