Would you want to see a Poirier - McGregor 4?

Not really but it’s always funny seeing McGregor lose. I wonder what excuses he will have next time. Probably that his leg never recovered.
 
giphy.gif

giphy.gif

100 replays and 1 like on TS !
Ban Them All !
 
No.

Also McGregor is done. Nobody in the UFC who has snapped their leg has ever come back as a serious fighter. It's sad but it's true.
You could definitely be right. But you're also looking at an extremely small sample size. 4 in the history of the UFC:
  1. Corey Hill - Was a .500 career fighter who was 2-2 at the time of his leg break. Hardly a good example. 4-7 after the break.
  2. Anderson - Was 38 at the time of his leg break. Hard to say whether age had just started to catch up with him.
  3. Weidman - Was 2-5 since (including) the title loss vs Rockhold (not including the Hall fight). Wasn't exactly setting the world on fire. Was in a steep decline prior to the break.
    • Hasn't fought since.
  4. Conor - 1-2 since going to box Floyd (not including Poirier 3), and looked to be on the way to a KO loss before the break.
  • Hasn't fought since.
The only one that numerically shows a serious decline is Anderson, but that arguably could just be him passing out of his prime. We would need a lot more up-and-coming and elite fighters at the early prime to break their legs to really make a solid impression of this.
 
Yes but just to see how off the deep end Conor goes once he loses again.
 
In my opinion Porier has beaten him soundly twice in a row. It's unfortunate that conman broke his leg, so the ending was not decisive in the last fight. But, any objective person would agree that Dustin was in complete control before the injury. I think Porier should move on and conman doesnt deserve any high profile fights if and when he does return. Unfortunately, that's not how things work now. It's all about making as much money a possible and some reason I guess conman still has a large following despite getting his butt kicked repeatedly and completely making an bafoon out of himself in social media. There's just no accounting for stupidity.
 
You could definitely be right. But you're also looking at an extremely small sample size. 4 in the history of the UFC:
  1. Corey Hill - Was a .500 career fighter who was 2-2 at the time of his leg break. Hardly a good example. 4-7 after the break.
  2. Anderson - Was 38 at the time of his leg break. Hard to say whether age had just started to catch up with him.
  3. Weidman - Was 2-5 since (including) the title loss vs Rockhold (not including the Hall fight). Wasn't exactly setting the world on fire. Was in a steep decline prior to the break.
    • Hasn't fought since.
  4. Conor - 1-2 since going to box Floyd (not including Poirier 3), and looked to be on the way to a KO loss before the break.
  • Hasn't fought since.
The only one that numerically shows a serious decline is Anderson, but that arguably could just be him passing out of his prime. We would need a lot more up-and-coming and elite fighters at the early prime to break their legs to really make a solid impression of this.
Credit where it's due. If there's anyone who can defy stats it's McGregor.
 
I dont want to see part 4. I do not see Dustin losing, but if by some fluke he does there will have to be a #5. That is just too many fights against the same person close together.
 
No.
Theres a beautiful thing brewing between the champ , diamond and Beneil ( and mak). Dana needs to understand the place where his Irish nephew finds himself.

Let's move the fuck on- Conor, if he wants to, can still make the meal ticket of his choosing.
 
Last edited:
No. I don't care to see McGregor again in any capacity
Alright, no need to panic.

Conor is only elite at marketing, but thats why i want to see him fight again.

I really hate we wont see aldo/conor 2. I still say that ko was a godsend.
 
Its always funny seeing Conor get beat up. But I want to see Dustin go for the title and face some more top LWs
 
Back
Top