Woman allows strangers to fondle her in public.. for science

mixmastermo

Red Belt
@red
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
9,453
And for feminism apparently.

http://www.someecards.com/news/women/milo-moire-artist-groping-consent/

"In her piece, Moiré wears a mirrored box in place of either her shirt or skirt, which features a hole cut out in the front, obscured with a curtain. With a megaphone, she invites any and all passersby to reach in and feel whatever they find there (her breasts and vagina) for 30 seconds. And while to a prudish American it might seem like a pervy peep show, Moiré knows exactly what she's doing—she's making a point about consent."

Think she made her point?
 
I hope someone with herpes fondle themselves first, then go fondle her after... for science as well.

200w.gif
 
Feminist logic: Letting hordes of random guys grope and feel you up to laugh about later with their buddies = Strong, respected woman

"Bro, this girl I just met on the street let me grab her tits and feel her up in front of hundreds of people. I was so impressed, she's really a class A gal!"
 
I don't really understand the thesis here.

Didn't she basically just accomplish the same thing as any girl in a 100-guy bukkake video? Only she didn't get paid and got arrested instead.

tumblr_m97k0d5lG51r0j5l2o1_500.png
 
Last edited:
I need a tissue.
 
Just because feminism allows you to let random dudes feel up your naughty bits in public doesn't mean feminism wants you to let random dudes feel up your naughty bits in public.
 
Oh boy, lots of bad science going on nowadays. A new form of prostitution.
 
Damn. Were ninjas really able to take the full plunge on those gills?
 
I understand the message she wants to get across- up to a point. Yes it's true you should only get freaky with people who consent to it. That's great and all, but that's something we've been taught since we were very small. Very few people are actually rapists.

A side effect of this demonstration is she offends people with certain beliefs or who follow certain cultural norms. She is essentially telling all of those people that she doesn't care how they feel about public decency, she needs to get her point across (and get turned on by random people walking by)
 
I understand the message she wants to get across- up to a point. Yes it's true you should only get freaky with people who consent to it. That's great and all, but that's something we've been taught since we were very small. Very few people are actually rapists.

A side effect of this demonstration is she offends people with certain beliefs or who follow certain cultural norms. She is essentially telling all of those people that she doesn't care how they feel about public decency, she needs to get her point across (and get turned on by random people walking by)

Only people who consent should have sex --> she consents to massive amounts of sex in public to make the point.

I don't think she really is making her point very well, if that is her point. A public rape would demonstrate that non-consensual sex is horrible. Her consenting to anyone and everyone fingerbanging her doesn't really demonstrate effectively that consent is necessary. It just demonstrates that she consents to lots of people fingerbanging her.

If I were to offer an analogous demonstration...

Theft is bad --> she gives away her life savings $100 at a time to strangers on the street.

Has she really made her point about theft effectively?

All she is demonstrating is that a woman is capable of consenting to being touched. Was anyone suggesting that women can't give that consent?
 
she just wants her titties fondled by random people and found a way to do it.
 
Back
Top