Will the Third World War be a Crusade?

[phoenixikki]

France has fallen. It's pretty much clear by now, they reached the point of no-return. Unless Le Pen is able to get elect and push it for reforms (which is almost impossible), or the French, and I mean the real French, start a civil war and depose Holland. Sweden is in a similar situation too, PC dominates everywhere and people live in a state of constant fear of saying the wrong things and get sacked.
Today a new terrorist attack happened in Germany, an Afghan refugee tried to kill people with an ax in a train, the funny thing is nowhere on the news they said that, now they just refer to them as a "perpetrator". Nowadays you really have to dig in to know the truth.
However there a lot of patriotic groups scattered through Europe, and they won't put up with this shot for much longer. War, or at least civil wars are going to ensue, it just a matter of time.

 

[Amerikuracana]

Maybe be could well be?

 

[ehtheist]

"France has fallen"? Big fan of hyperbole, eh?

 

[Bald1]

"France has fallen"? Big fan of hyperbole, eh?

Or Gerard Butler movies.

 

[Thames]

Ignoring the insanity of your argument, I can convincingly say; No.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_irreligion

 

[ocean size]

France has fallen lol get a grip dude.

I'm sure if a GOP government kicks it off, much of their base will be sold on it being a crusade.

 

[lfd0311]

France has fallen. It's pretty much clear by now, they reached the point of no-return. Unless Le Pen is able to get elect and push it for reforms (which is almost impossible), or the French, and I mean the real French, start a civil war and depose Holland. Sweden is in a similar situation too, PC dominates everywhere and people live in a state of constant fear of saying the wrong things and get sacked.
Today a new terrorist attack happened in Germany, an Afghan refugee tried to kill people with an ax in a train, the funny thing is nowhere on the news they said that, now they just refer to them as a "perpetrator". Nowadays you really have to dig in to know the truth.
However there a lot of patriotic groups scattered through Europe, and they won't put up with this shot for much longer. War, or at least civil wars are going to ensue, it just a matter of time.

Sherdog covered this yesterday, bro...

 

[Thunderflash500]

There won't be a war. The people are castrated. They wouldn't even know what to fight for. Kick muslims out? Uphold their own traditions and culture? Who could fight for such racist ideas?? Their idea of good is completely twisted. I wouldn't even be surprised if femenists start arguing rape is good if it's a Muslim man raping a white European woman. It literally wouldn't be shocking anymore. The left is so far gone, and most people are in general. We've been conditioned so thoroughly.

It's like saying a cow will rebel. It's not even an option. They'd probably go to the gas chambers themselves if you told them it's racist not to. People saying the gas will kill you will be called conspiracy theorists.

 

[IDL]

The only realistic way I could see it is if a nationalist party got into power and the globalists moved against them. They could very well foment unrest to further their anti-nationalist objectives.

An engineered economic crisis that could be pinned on some political party could kick it off. Media is already controlled by globalists for the most part, so they could control the narratives and turn the people any which way.

 

[Rex Kwon Do]

Maybe there could be some sort of civil war in Europe, but a global conflagration, doubt it. That third world war will be over something more international and China will factor prominently.

 

[Rob Battisti]

Just like WWI was different than any war before it and just like WWII was different than that, I don't believe the next real war will even be recognizable as such.

I see much less overt violence and destruction and more infrastructure tampering, economic manipulation and subversion.

I mean, what countries really could handle the full outright power of an unleashed United States? Nuclear weapons aside, any major scale conflict with the gloves off would be incredibly one sided in our favor.

 

[IDL]

Just like WWI was different than any war before it and just like WWII was different than that, I don't believe the next real war will even be recognizable as such.

I see much less overt violence and destruction and more infrastructure tampering, economic manipulation and subversion.

I mean, what countries really could handle the full outright power of an unleashed United States? Nuclear weapons aside, any major scale conflict with the gloves off would be incredibly one sided in our favor.

The world is a constant state of war. As you say, it takes place in the economics realm and subversion (idiology, propoganda, politics). Also mass migrations and demographics are also used in warfare (as is the case in Europe)

Empires can expand and nations conquered without any direct conflict.


If there is going to be a major conflict it will have been decided upon many years in advance. The only reason for one is to establish global control in the aftermath, and maybe redraw borders and things like that.

 

[ehtheist]

Ignoring the insanity of your argument, I can convincingly say; No.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_irreligion

I really dislike the way these graphics present China. Chinese popular religion totally gums up the works making for *massive* misrepresentation because, simply put, they're not even close to secular as a group - they just don't follow the same rulebook of organized religions that people who gather stats do.

"Counting the number of religious people anywhere is hard; counting them in China is even harder. Low response rates, non-random samples, and adverse political and cultural climates are persistent problems.[71] One scholar concludes that statistics on religious believers in China "cannot be accurate in a real scientific sense," since definitions of "religion" exclude people who do not see themselves as members of a religious organization but are still "religious" in their daily actions and fundamental beliefs.[72] The concept of "religion" in China is very different from that in the Western world. The Chinese mindset is characterised by an harmonious holism, that is a worldview in which all things are part of the whole. There is an organic oneness in which every aspect reflects and presupposes the other aspects in a constant process of growing and transforming. For this reason, the forms of Chinese religious expression tend to be syncretic and following one religion does not necessarily mean the rejection or denial of others.[73]

Another matter of current debate is whether some important belief systems, primarily Confucianism, constitute "religions".["


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China

(apologies for Wikipedia, but it's the easiest way to get a broad look at a fairly widely accepted truth about Chinese religion)

 

[dissolved]

I prefer the term "Response To Violent Islamic Expansion."

 

[Rod1]

I really dislike the way these graphics present China. Chinese popular religion totally gums up the works making for *massive* misrepresentation because, simply put, they're not even close to secular as a group - they just don't follow the same rulebook of organized religions that people who gather do.

"Counting the number of religious people anywhere is hard; counting them in China is even harder. Low response rates, non-random samples, and adverse political and cultural climates are persistent problems.[71] One scholar concludes that statistics on religious believers in China "cannot be accurate in a real scientific sense," since definitions of "religion" exclude people who do not see themselves as members of a religious organization but are still "religious" in their daily actions and fundamental beliefs.[72] The concept of "religion" in China is very different from that in the Western world. The Chinese mindset is characterised by an harmonious holism, that is a worldview in which all things are part of the whole. There is an organic oneness in which every aspect reflects and presupposes the other aspects in a constant process of growing and transforming. For this reason, the forms of Chinese religious expression tend to be syncretic and following one religion does not necessarily mean the rejection or denial of others.[73]

Another matter of current debate is whether some important belief systems, primarily Confucianism, constitute "religions".["


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China

(apologies for Wikipedia, but it's the easiest way to get a broad look at a fairly widely accepted truth about Chinese religion)

Asking if a chinese in China if he is religious is like asking a Saudi in SA if he is an atheist.

 

[Voodoo_Child906]

 

[Abezal]

NO, but more like a network of civil wars.

 

[ehtheist]

Asking if a chinese in China if he is religious is like asking a Saudi in SA if he is an atheist.

Indeed. You go to China and you're likely to see Buddha sitting at the bottom of a crucifix totem pole with Jesus hanging off the top and a yin-yang on his forehead and a dreidel in his hand - which they're about to burn in sacrifice to the ten thousand things of the Tao. It's a strange religious culture, but there is certainly religious belief.

 

[Lord_Impaler]

There will certainly be a large, violent conflict between nationalism and globalism that takes place in Europe.

When it will happen, and the exact nature of the conflict, I don't know, that's really hard to say.

 

[Rod1]

There will certainly be a large, violent conflict between nationalism and globalism that takes place in Europe.

When it will happen, and the exact nature of the conflict, I don't know, that's really hard to say.

Globalism will win.