• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Wikileaks releases over 2,000 emails from Clinton campaign chair (John Podesta) UPDATED

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not reading all of these pages. Is there evidence of actual criminal wrongdoing and not just backroom political maneuvering (damage control is not the sort of thing that makes me wonder)? I understand that the maneuvering can be offensive but I find it ends up being that whether or not someone agrees with the goal dictates how they interpret the act itself.

So, I'm looking for something that actually skirts the line.

Her campaign being in contact with a superpac which is flat out illegal is a big one. Theres another one involving Hillary being in contact with the state and doj I think during her subpoena. That one I don't understand as much so you'll have to ask someone else.
 
Well, it sounds like you guys had better arm up and start a revolution. Or are you cowards?


giphy12.gif

I like you Fawlty, but the fact you put blinders on to all of this is sad. You're smarter than that, but you're dumbing yourself down to please your party just cause it's easier. Shameful.
 
How do you know some haven't been altered? Also you guys are crazy if you think Trump is the answer to corruption in politics. I really wish th ufo ones were legit/ had merit tho no joking

Doubt anyone believes trump is the answer but neither is Hillary. I'm not so scared of trump that I'm willing to just ignore all of this.
 
I guess asking a question does not express interest.
Well thanks for the help :(

Mike, my point is that there is soooooooooooo much information in this one thread its mind boggling. There is enough information in this thread to start 50 independent threads. You would have to scroll through and just read the headlines to see the volume of wtf in this thread. I can't condense it for you, it is a massive amount of stuff. Over 10,000 e-mails have been released and this thread takes the best of those and lists them for you. All you have to do is look at it.
 
So who pulls all these strings @IDL?



th

Skimming over that post, it looks to me like that is how the game is played by everyone at that level. It's just the populations are kept in the dark to the true nature of such game.

Very dirty, and very corrupt. But so are all the other players.

It's one of the reasons why when these people come in talking as if they are humanitarians (George Soros), it's best to just laugh.

As to who pulls the strings of a particular deal, I'd look at who owns these companies and what kinds of associations they have.
 
Her campaign being in contact with a superpac which is flat out illegal is a big one. Theres another one involving Hillary being in contact with the state and doj I think during her subpoena. That one I don't understand as much so you'll have to ask someone else.
Can you imagine the uproar if someone in the Trump campaign made derogatory remarks like "needy Latinos" as Hillary's team did? Yet she's pretty much getting a pass on it.
 
Not one single person has disputed the authenticity of the emails, including Podesta - in fact, they've verified the authenticity.

See? You just posted a conspiracy theory.
Not one single person has disputed the authenticity of the emails, including Podesta - in fact, they've verified the authenticity.

See? You just posted a conspiracy theory.
Lots of rumors on the internet some were altered or falsified just saying. Some people are saying it. Not saying its true but people are saying it.
 
Lots of rumors on the internet some were altered or falsified just saying. Some people are saying it. Not saying its true but people are saying it.

Yes some people are saying these things. Yet they had the head of the DNC step down. DNC then apologized to Bernie supporters. You had Hillary answering a question about having a private and public policy (not denying the email). So maybe there is some false stuff but clearly some of
It is real.
 
Doubt anyone believes trump is the answer but neither is Hillary. I'm not so scared of trump that I'm willing to just ignore all of this.
There's many who believe Trump is gonna save the nation like some kinda weird demogouge messiah. I would rather have someone else but our choices are Hillary or Trump so I'm going with Hillary
 


This is insane. Not even 3 months ago we barely heard anything about Russia outside of Putin being an alpha male. Now it seems tensions are escalating everyday...out of nowhere and for no reason. Now we are on the verge of cyber warfare which will undoubtedly lead to real warfare.

These war monger liberals are going to destroy the world.
 
Its not that Trump is the answer, its that Hillary sure as shit isn't. She is the epitome of a corrupt Washington insider.
Well all we have is Hillary or Trump so I'm going with the best option.
 
This is insane. Not even 3 months ago we barely heard anything about Russia outside of Putin being an alpha male. Now it seems tensions are escalating everyday...out of nowhere and for no reason. Now we are on the verge of cyber warfare which will undoubtedly lead to real warfare.

These war monger liberals are going to destroy the world.
I kept reading conspiracy theories about Russia and damn if it doesn't look like they are coming to light.

It's not for "no reason." After Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya, the Obama regime wanted to see the Assad regime in Syria toppled but the Russians stood with their allies. Assad and Russia stand in the White House's way of playing chess in the MENA region. How many more nations are going to have to destabilize till they're satisfied? Why isn't the left calling the Obama regime out on their actions?
 
:eek:
Is there another link for this...


In fairness, I'm no fan of the Houthis.

Edit - from the link above:

Schultz said the strike was approved by President Obama on the recommendation of the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Pentagon officials told NPR that they had “no sense of any civilians being killed,” but it is unclear how they know, and what type of review was undertaken.

Houthi forces denied having launched the missiles at a U.S. destroyer, and promised to respond to kind to the display of military force.

The attack came just after the first sign that the Obama administration might be having second thoughts about the massacres committed by the Saudi coalition with U.S. weapons.

Just four days ago, the Saudi coalition bombed the funeral of a rebel-appointed government minister’s father, killing 125 and wounding 525 in one of the worst massacres of the war. Fragments of what appeared to be U.S.-made bombs were photographed at the scene.

The White House responded by promising to initiate a review of U.S. assistance to Saudi Arabia, and issued its first public threat to stop supporting the coalition. “U.S. security cooperation with Saudi Arabia is not a blank check,” Ned Price, spokesman for the White House National Security Council, said in a statement. Price added that the administration is “prepared to adjust our support so as to better align with U.S. principles, values and interests.”
 
I kept reading conspiracy theories about Russia and damn if it doesn't look like they are coming to light.

It's not for "no reason." After Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya, the Obama regime wanted to see the Assad regime in Syria toppled but the Russians stood with their allies. Assad and Russia stand in the White House's way of playing chess in the MENA region. How many more nations are going to have to destabilize till they're satisfied?
Right, I'm sure it's not for no reason but on the surface that's what it seems like. One day you don't hear a peep about russia...and then the next we're back to the cold war.

But yeah I agree that is probably what is going on and it's pretty fucking evil.

Why isn't the left calling the Obama regime out on their actions?

Because Trump said some stuff...
 
Her campaign being in contact with a superpac which is flat out illegal is a big one. Theres another one involving Hillary being in contact with the state and doj I think during her subpoena. That one I don't understand as much so you'll have to ask someone else.


So I went to look into the super PAC thing and I got this from the WSJ:
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/...veal-ties-between-clinton-campaign-super-pac/

The emails—whose authenticity the Clinton campaign declined to verify—purport to show that the Clinton campaign sought to bolster fundraising of its allied super PAC, Priorities USA Action, but advised aides how to stay within the confines of campaign-finance law, which prohibits campaigns and super PACs from coordinating on strategy.

and

Before she officially declared her candidacy, there were few limits on how Mrs. Clinton and the super PAC could interact. Other candidates, such as former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, took advantage of those rules to raise tens of millions for their super PACs before beginning their campaigns.

So, it appears that they she didn't violate any rules but took advantage of the flexibility in said rules to maximum effect. I haven't looked into the state and doj stuff yet.

But this is part of why I'm finding it hard to take the Wikileaks seriously. They show a ton of rules manipulations and then people insist that it's equivalent to wrongdoing. It's like the Trump tax thing. Trump manipulating the tax code to his benefit isn't the same as Trump committing wrongdoing. But in both cases, I don't blame the person for staying within the law but getting a gain. It tells me something about their priorities and goals but we already knew Trump chased cash and we already knew that Hillary is a manipulative politician, more confirmation doesn't tell us anything new. All that shows is that they're both good at their chosen careers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top