Wikileaks releases over 2,000 emails from Clinton campaign chair (John Podesta) UPDATED

[theBLADE1]

Well, it sounds like you guys had better arm up and start a revolution. Or are you cowards?

Yeah you joke. Go ahead and have your laughs now but it will be increasingly less funny when shit becomes a reality.

 

[Dr J]

According To Google Trends, There Is Far More Interest In WikiLeaks/Podesta E-mails Than Trump Scandals, Guess Which One 'Non-Partisan' Corporate Media Has Wall-To-Wall Coverage Of?

People don't need Google to read about Trump scandals. They go to CNN for that.

 

[in the]

 

[in the]

People don't need Google to read about Trump scandals. They go to CNN for that.

The giant tech companies and corporate media conglomerates are in the bag for Hillary. It's frightening.

 

[Bat Dad]

Yeah you joke. Go ahead and have your laughs now but it will be increasingly less funny when shit becomes a reality.

 

[M3t4tr0n]

Lmao CTers having full on throbbing erections itt but will have blueballs come Nov 8th

 

[Fawlty]

Yeah you joke. Go ahead and have your laughs now but it will be increasingly less funny when shit becomes a reality.

All I see is a lot of broadband-narcotized chickens. Now that they have identified that our country is corrupt beyond hope and in immediate danger of being destroyed, their duty is to save this country by any means necessary. Courage with conviction- apparently we need it now more than ever.

lol

 

[in the]

The leftist media.

 

[IDL]

People don't need Google to read about Trump scandals. They go to CNN for that.

I'd think people would hear about Trump scandals because it is shown on television and radio all the time, so they would be more likely to google it because it is on the public mind.

Sort of like how the Bruce Jenner media blitz happened I would assume googling of Bruce Jenner would go up as a response.

 

[in the]

Lmao CTers having full on throbbing erections itt but will have blueballs come Nov 8th

I like you but this is beyond full fucking retard. It's not a conspiracy when there is written evidence.

The real conspiracy are people like you and Fawlty who have your heads in the sand and refuse to pull out of your bubble worlds because you fear your false realities will be popped.

 

[Bat Dad]

Lmao CTers having full on throbbing erections itt but will have blueballs come Nov 8th

 

[in the]

 

[in the]

 

[in the]

 

[MusterX]

Well, it sounds like you guys had better arm up and start a revolution. Or are you cowards?

So basically you are saying don't be mad at the mainstream media fixing this election and both our candidates being shitty, and Washington being corrupt. There is no in between, either STFU or revolution? I'm trying to understand what your message is but I don't understand it. This entire episode of American history is dissappointing beyond belief.

 

[panamaican]

I'm not reading all of these pages. Is there evidence of actual criminal wrongdoing and not just backroom political maneuvering (damage control is not the sort of thing that makes me wonder)? I understand that the maneuvering can be offensive but I find it ends up being that whether or not someone agrees with the goal dictates how they interpret the act itself.

So, I'm looking for something that actually skirts the line.

 

[Hogey]

This shit is sick. Right or left you should care about this shit instead of deflecting it. These politicians don't give a fuck about you, your race, your sexual preference, your economic problems. You don't matter to them, even if their cronies in media tell you they do.

 

[in the]

 

[TheStruggle]

All I see is a lot of broadband-narcotized chickens. Now that they have identified that our country is corrupt beyond hope and in immediate danger of being destroyed, their duty is to save this country by any means necessary. Courage with conviction- apparently we need it now more than ever.

lol

We could start by taking you out before November, I mean we are talking about the fate of America here

 

[MusterX]

I'm not reading all of these pages. Is there evidence of actual criminal wrongdoing and not just backroom political maneuvering (damage control is not the sort of thing that makes me wonder)? I understand that the maneuvering can be offensive but I find it ends up being that whether or not someone agrees with the goal dictates how they interpret the act itself.

So, I'm looking for something that actually skirts the line.

I don't know, how about virtually every mainstream media outlet that matters acting as a mouthpiece for the DNC? Does that bother you at all?