• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Wikileaks releases over 2,000 emails from Clinton campaign chair (John Podesta) UPDATED

Status
Not open for further replies.
So which emails are we taking seriously? The alien ones, the ones with hilariously obvious offensive language thrown in, or the ones that speak in robotically perfect detail about names and places in criminal conspiracy?
 
Which, if true, would be worse in your eyes: using the "n word" in private or being incompetent and causing Americans to get killed? Sadly, in this election, it would be the former.

And do you honestly believe any of these rich, powerful white people who have been running for president haven't made racist remarks in their lifetimes?

Trump sucks, and getting caught on tape would absolutely bury him politically, but pretending racist talk in private would be unique to Trump is naive.
You really think Trump is competent? And no I don't think all rich powerful white people sit around shooting off the n word.
 
I'm still waiting for context examples where it's acceptable other than singing along to a rap song. Also the rumored tapes are supposedly of a rage rant variety.

Again...you keep asking for examples where it is 'acceptable' or 'ok'. I never claimed using the word is acceptable or ok depending on context. I said there are contexts in which using the word is not racist and is not an issue one should be concerned with. And I also made the point that even if it is in an offensive or racist manner that is still doesn't mean one should pull support.
 
Again...you keep asking for examples where it is 'acceptable' or 'ok'. I never claimed using the word is acceptable or ok depending on context. I said there are contexts in which using the word is not racist and is not an issue one should be concerned with. And I also made the point that even if it is in an offensive or racist manner that is still doesn't mean one should pull support.
We can always just end the convo by you admitting you're too stubborn to bail on Trump no matter what he says or does.
 
We can always just end the convo by you admitting you're too stubborn to bail on Trump no matter what he says or does.

Or you could just stop asking loaded and misleading questions about things I haven't claimed. But I will admit it would take a lot for me to bail on the future of the country. It would probably take something extraordinary ya know.
 
I think you probably just haven't paid enough attention lol

On what do their opinions differ? Neither one contributes much besides partisan shit-talking. Both trying to be funny. Both got an AV of a man's face with a somewhat incredulous look in his eye. And most importantly, matching IP's (if true). And if it isn't I'll refrain from perpetuating that theory.
 
Or you could just stop asking loaded and misleading questions about things I haven't claimed. But I will admit it would take a lot for me to bail on the future of the country. It would probably take something extraordinary ya know.
They're not loaded questions I just don't understand your logic. Also continued support of Trump is pretty much bailing on your country in order to save face.
 
On what do their opinions differ? Neither one contributes much besides partisan shit-talking. Both trying to be funny. Both got an AV of a man's face with a somewhat incredulous look in his eye. And most importantly, matching IP's (if true). And if it isn't I'll refrain from perpetuating that theory.
Sloppy goes on a lot of epic rants while M3t4 is about the one-liners. Neither sounds like the other in tone either. M3t4 laughs at republican shit too, and anything ridiculous in general, while sloppy is more serious and soapbox-y (in a good way imo). They're almost polar opposites in their style.

Not that it's impossible for people to have very different alter egos but this is about the least likely pair you could put together.
 
On what do their opinions differ? Neither one contributes much besides partisan shit-talking. Both trying to be funny. Both got an AV of a man's face with a somewhat incredulous look in his eye. And most importantly, matching IP's (if true). And if it isn't I'll refrain from perpetuating that theory.
I'm starting to think you have a personal agenda due to jealousy or something. Show proof of us being alts or stfu
 
You gotta admit it's a pretty important one
Competence is very important. So if it is brought to light that Benghazi was indeed Clinton incompetence, it should be a pretty huge deal--again, assuming these emails aren't fake (haven't seen any other links aside from Sodas). It wouldn't be, though. Using the n-word would cause a much bigger ruckus.


Also, probably incompetent <<< proven incompetence that led to Americans getting killed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top