Wikileaks releases over 2,000 emails from Clinton campaign chair (John Podesta) UPDATED

[in the]

*For my question*, it's basically some variation of [not quite phrased right yet]: I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4099

 

[BrotherClaudio]

Buckle up, fellas

We are not alone

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1766

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1802

Buckle up buckaroos

 

[GhostZ06]

i would need


26


exacty


27


er i mean


28

 

[HeLLMuTT]

Well it would depend on the context obviously. Most likely it would probably be just another non-issue pushed by the State in an effort to destroy the guy who dared to challenge them.

Don't forget the 200 tons of gold he had and was about to start a new North African currency with...

Gold is gone btw.

 

[M3t4tr0n]

Well it would depend on the context obviously. Most likely it would probably be just another non-issue pushed by the State in an effort to destroy the guy who dared to challenge them.

What context would it be ok other then reciting rap lyrics?

 

[TheComebackKid]

What context would it be ok other then reciting rap lyrics?

I never said it would be "ok". I just said, depending on context, it would most likely be a non-issue. It would just be a another tool the state is using to try and destroy Donald Trump in order to maintain their sphere of power over us. It's pretty sickening witness actually.

 

[M3t4tr0n]

I never said it would be "ok". I just said, depending on context, it would most likely be a non-issue. It would just be a another tool the state is using to try and destroy Donald Trump in order to maintain their sphere of power over us. It's pretty sickening witness actually.

It's a non issue wtf lmao? Why because it's locker room talk? I'm already pretty sure you're not a devout christian now I'm beginning to question if you're even an african american.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Are you sure you're not my alt too? Perhaps Hans is. Most people here who have alts have one on each side of the political spectrum

Really? The only reason I've used an alt is to get to the bottom of the Barbara Bush/Aleister Crowley thing without anyone thinking I'm crazy.

 

[in the]

 

[TheComebackKid]

It's a non issue wtf lmao? Why because it's locker room talk? I'm already pretty sure you're not a devout christian now I'm beginning to question if you're even an african american.

If he wasn't using the word in an attempt to insult or upset someone...then on what grounds should I claim offense? And if I did claim offense...why is that so important that I should automatically concede the supreme court, national sovereignty, and personal liberty over it?

 

[M3t4tr0n]

Really? The only reason I've used an alt is to get to the bottom of the Barbara Bush/Aleister Crowley thing without anyone thinking I'm crazy.

I thought maybe @IDL was your alt

 

[M3t4tr0n]

If he wasn't using the word in an attempt to insult or upset someone...then on what grounds should I claim offense? And if I did claim offense...why is that so important that I should automatically concede the supreme court, national sovereignty, and personal liberty over it?

National sovereignty and personal liberty aren't going anywhere except possibly for minorities when it comes to personal liberties and everyone when it comes to national sovereignty if Trump gets in.

 

[TheComebackKid]

National sovereignty and personal liberty aren't going anywhere except possibly for minorities when it comes to personal liberties and everyone when it comes to national sovereignty if Trump gets in.

Well we can agree to disagree I suppose

 

[Dr J]

It's fake/doctored. What do you think about the Trump tapes about to be released with him using the N word on The Apprentice? Would you pull your support then?

Which, if true, would be worse in your eyes: using the "n word" in private or being incompetent and causing Americans to get killed? Sadly, in this election, it would be the former.

And do you honestly believe any of these rich, powerful white people who have been running for president haven't made racist remarks in their lifetimes?

Trump sucks, and getting caught on tape would absolutely bury him politically, but pretending racist talk in private would be unique to Trump is naive.

 

[TheComebackKid]

Which, if true, would be worse in your eyes: using the "n word" in private or being incompetent and causing Americans to get killed? Sadly, in this election, it would be the former.

And do you honestly believe any of these rich, powerful white people who have been running for president haven't made racist remarks in their lifetimes?

Trump sucks, and getting caught on tape would absolutely bury him politically, but pretending racist talk in private would be unique to Trump is naive.

It's also good to point out that not every use of the n word constitutes "racist talk". Context is important.

 

[Fawlty]

Maybe he's another one of this guy's (@sloppypie and @M3t4tr0n) alts. Someone else claimed these accounts were coming from the same IP and based on the posting style I believe it.

You'd have to be legitimately fucking retarded to think sloppy and m3t4 are the same poster based on style.

 

[Dr J]

@M3t4tr0n Honest question, is the Benghazi thing a true leak, or was that just something randomly posted on Twitter?

 

[mcveteran81]

I thought maybe @IDL was your alt

They are two complete polar opposites in every way possible lol

 

[in the]

"We've all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly."

 

[M3t4tr0n]

It's also good to point out that not every use of the n word constitutes "racist talk". Context is important.

I'm still waiting for context examples where it's acceptable other than singing along to a rap song. Also the rumored tapes are supposedly of a rage rant variety.