Wikileaks releases emails from Clinton campaign chair (John Podesta) Prt 2 Assange Internet Shut Off

[in the]

FBI Docs: Hillary Was So Unpleasant Security Agents Didn't Want to Protect Her

 

[in the]

"Nothing to see here" brigade still at it, I see.

 

[IDL]

"Nothing to see here" brigade still at it, I see.

Hyperbole aside, there is a grain of truth in the sentiment that sometimes the corporate media IS forced to cover things, but only if enough people know about what they are NOT covering.

It becomes a balancing act of trying to maintain the veneer of credibility, with the desire to maintain narratives and protect their owners interests.

 

[in the]

 

[Letssnuggle]

I'm starting to think you actually have a real gambling problem Please see help Jack.

Please take your pick of any of the following.


MEDIA COLLUSION
Clinton Staff hosts private “off-the-record cocktail party” with 38 “influential” reporters, journalists, editors, and anchors (from 16 different mainstream media outlets including CNN, NBC, CBS, NYT, MSNBC, & more) with the stated goal of “framing the race”:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5953 (see attachment)

John Podesta hosts a dinner with reporters: I’m “Cooking for 30 of your reporter friends”:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4543#efmAAGABu
Full list of media guests: https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12063

Donna Brazile (CNN contributor at the time, and current DNC Chairman now) leaked a CNN town hall question to Hillary’s staff:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205#efmAD-AMa

Hillary Clinton reads directly from script during Phone Interview with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4274#efmAEcAWc
Video: https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/786158412119707648

Boston Globe colludes with Clinton campaign to give Hillary a “big presence”:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4180#efmAJhALE

John Podesta receiving drafts of New York Times articles before they’re published:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/844
Her blatant conservative leanings( was never a true progressive like she claimed)
Ad for Hillary Clinton secretly pitched by ‘right-leaning’ Heat Street ‘journalist’ Louise Mensch:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5740#efmAMvAUe

More media collusion: NYT and AP “helpful” to Clinton campaign:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5502

Brent Budowsky (writer for The Hill and Huffington Post) warns John Podesta about possible Hillary attacks and that not talking to the press is killing her support: “I’m not going to raise this publicly, but..”:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6453#efmARBAUVAVJAXBAfNAhWAkaAl4

Huffington Post contributor Frank Islam writes to John Podesta in email titled “My blogs in the Huffington Post”, says “I am committed to make sure she is elected the next president.” “Please let me know if I can be of any service to you”:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5988#efmADmAE6AF-AG1

Gee I wonder who called this during the Democratic primaries?
Clinton staff colluding with New York Times and Wall Street Journal to paint Hillary’s economic policies in a “progressive” light:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9007#efmAcTAdS

I'm in no way a fan of Trump but still relevant....

CNBC panelist colluding with John Podesta on what to ask Trump when he calls in for an interview:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7710#efmAakAd6AjgAlR

Clinton staff “Placing a story” with Politico / New York Times: “place a story with a friendly journalist” “we have a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico” “we should shape likely leaks in the best light for HRC”:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7524#efmA14A2IA3AA36A9fA-kA-6BAICwpCx4

Clinton staff “placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper)”:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272#efmBKsBMU

Clinton staff appearing to control the release times of Associated Press articles:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8460

You're responding to a ideologues opinion with facts. It's a waste of time. Hell of a post though sir.

 

[in the]

Hyperbole aside, there is a grain of truth in the sentiment that sometimes the corporate media IS forced to cover things, but only if enough people know about what they are NOT covering.

It becomes a balancing act of trying to maintain the veneer of credibility, with the desire to maintain narratives and protect their owners interests.

From what I remember of his AMA on Reddit, supposedly he used front companies (offshore shell companies) to look legit and was invited to the White House. Guess we'll see tomorrow.

 

[theBLADE1]

FUK DAT BITCH

 

[in the]

 

[Quipling]

The email that tweet alleges to link to is this one:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12278

It looks nothing like that screenshot. Did you bother to factcheck at all before sharing that?

 

[IDL]

The email that tweet alleges to link to is this one:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12278

It looks nothing like that screenshot. Did you bother to factcheck at all before sharing that?

I just looked and the link is correct.

On the wiki page, notice there is an 'attachements' tab. That twitter is showing the contents of the attached document, not the text of the email conversation.

edit: Actually the email Id that contains the attachement is not 12278, it's 12280
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12280

 

[JDragon]

I've seen lots of stuff that is problematic but...who was this mail sent to?

 

[Ruprecht]

I've seen lots of stuff that is problematic but...who was this mail sent to?

From Hillary's communications director, Kristina Schake, to John Podesta. I don't see the issue with it really.
This is the first interview she did after the prep.

 

[second sight]

Defense contractor “white hat” tells FBI that Judicial Watch paid him to hunt for Clinton hack

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...o-search-for-hacked-clinton-blumenthal-files/

 

[Anung Un Rama]

FBI Docs: Hillary Was So Unpleasant Security Agents Didn't Want to Protect Her

I have two friends who can verify this. Its second hand for me, but they've heard it right from the horse's mouth.

 

[Rygu]

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Please refer to my earlier post regarding the wisdom of not giving a response to rumors of a political nature.

Whats your summary of this situation? Your posts have been too cryptic for me to figure it out.

 

[in the]

I've seen lots of stuff that is problematic but...who was this mail sent to?

From Hillary's communications director, Kristina Schake, to John Podesta. I don't see the issue with it really.
This is the first interview she did after the prep.

In a vacuum, I would agree with Rup, but these leaks have shown that what Hillary dictates, people in the media follow.

That's why her internet shills, Correct the Record, went dark for a few days when she collapsed on 9/11. They were waiting for word straight from the Hillary team as to how to spin what happened (and we got the whole "power through" narrative).


So the real question is, how did the media treat this plan of attack? Given everything that has leaked, I'm not prone to believe they were resistant to it.

 

[in the]

I have two friends who can verify this. Its second hand for me, but they've heard it right from the horse's mouth.

http://nypost.com/2015/10/02/secret-service-agents-hillary-is-a-nightmare-to-work-with/

 

[in the]

Defense contractor “white hat” tells FBI that Judicial Watch paid him to hunt for Clinton hack

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...o-search-for-hacked-clinton-blumenthal-files/

The comments section might as well be written by JVS.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Boston Globe:
As watchdog, media belong in doghouse

Unfortunately, we have learned via WikiLeaks that the media have failed to live up to their responsibilities. News organizations and reporters have been colluding with the Clinton campaign to cover up her scandals and promote her candidacy.

Reminiscent of the media during the build up to the Iraq War. I'm sure they'll apologize 2 years into Clinton's reign. Or not.