So here's what I'm confused about... I couldn't care less if they release more damning info or not, on either candidate. But how can anyone claim that a slowed release, to keep it in the news and give it longer legs to damage her campaign, isn't completely propaganda meddling with the elections? Don't you worry about a questionable (I'm not taking side on of wikileaks is good or bad, but I think we can all agree they are a questionable org) trying to manipulate an election for a certain outcome? Granted its not some enemy state, but wouldn't you guys be completely uneasy if it was ISIS slowly releasing this info in hopes to sway elections in a favorable way? This should at least raise some eyebrows.
This isn't about the truth getting out. If it was, there would be no reason to not just data dump at all (like how the panama papers were I think). This is a slowed release in hopes of manipulating peoples thoughts on a candidate.