- Joined
- Jun 13, 2016
- Messages
- 1,953
- Reaction score
- 175
Those guys cut so much weight, they weren't even small in their new divisions anywaysI find that size matters less in striking than grappling
That's why MT fighters barely cut any weight, while wrestlers have died trying to cut like 20+% of their bodyweight.
Strikers have more success moving up weight classes in MMA as well for proof of this (Whittaker, Dan Hooker, Rumble etc)
heavyweight boxing doesn't have a size limit yet how many guys over 300 pounds have won the world title?
There are dozens of 300 pound athletes in ncaa football who have been cut by the nfl or didn't make the nfl. Why havn't they transitioned to beat down guys smaller then them?
Heard of bob sapp and seen him get beatYou obviously haven't heard of Bob Sapp.
ps: you didn't have to revive this thread for such a useless comment.
I honestly can’t see any strategy that would have allowed Chris Byrd to prevail over a brute like Ike ibeabuchi. Size played a big role in that one.after 200 pounds size doesn't matter much. Boxing has shown that. One fighter might be 207 but a lot faster while the guy who is 247 might be slower and may run out of fuel faster. After 200 pounds two equally skilled opponents will come down to the strategy
Those guys cut so much weight, they weren't even small in their new divisions anyways