Why is Weidmans KO of Anderson listed as KO (punches)?

[Blayt7hh]

They're lazy and barely competent. Plenty of fights could have more specific finishes listed.

Yeah. KO (left hook, cross jab jab cross)

 

[no fat chicks]

because its not neccesary TS

 

[effedup]

Umm yea..

 

[fight4ippon]

as mentioned left hook is a punch right?

 

[Blayt7hh]

And I mean, what is with this submission(armbar) horseshit. How do we know if it was from the guard, mount or sidemount??????

 

[BillyPilgrim]

I'm assuming TS is high.

I'm also high. TS makes perfect sense. A hook doesn't connect the chin in punching motion without arcing a trajectory equal to a straight punches lateral diameter.

 

[Kanster]

Should have been KO (weakest looking left hook eva).

 

[Charlie Sheen]

I'm also high. TS makes perfect sense. A hook doesn't connect the chin in punching motion without arcing a trajectory equal to a straight punches lateral diameter.

Ugh...

 

[Jesse James]

because a left hook is a punch there is no need for it additionally

Winner......Geezus, Can TS really be that stupid? He must be trolling!:redface:

 

[BillyPilgrim]

Ugh...

Did you actually take any of what I said seriously? It was complete gibberish!

 

[Charlie Sheen]

Did you actually take any of what I said seriously? It was complete gibberish!

Fuckin' lulz then. :icon_chee

 

[kappaz]

who cares?

 

[keyster]

And not KO (left hook and punches)?

It should have been KO (rape)!