- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 6,560
- Reaction score
- 0
It's about getting to a beautiful place with no memory.
Well, that sounds pretty, but what does that even mean?
It's about getting to a beautiful place with no memory.
Watch LIFE OF PI.Well, that sounds pretty, but what does that even mean?
The question I have to ask of that, and this also pertains to literary experts, how much of that is "the establishment" filtering potential "experts?"
I mean, in the literary field, what are the chances you'll ever be considered an expert if you like Stephen King? In other words, do you have to like what the experts like to become an expert? Or as you learn and become an expert, do you naturally develop the same likes as the other experts?
Something tells me it's not so natural...
I thought it was great the first hundred times I watched it, but then I watched it high, and found so much humor in the long melodramatic scenes that rendered it all so corny and therefore making it a movie I am unable to take seriously now.
Sometimes people like happy endings.
But how did Andy put the poster back??
Man rape. You put man rape in a movie/show and it becomes critically acclaimed and edgy. Look at HBO's Oz - complete drivel, but there is man rape and penises and everybody acts like it's brilliant shit.
Pulp Fiction is another example. Marcellus never gets fucked in the ass and I bet there is a little less acclaim for the movie. Deliverance is another - take the "squeal like a pig" scene and nobody even goes to see that boring ass movie.
Great movie. It's one of those movies where I can be channel flipping and if I come across it, I can just start watching it regardless of what scene is playing.
There are a lot of movies with man rape that don't get critical acclaim. But I do agree that both Oz and Pulp Fiction are fairly overrated.
If the top two corners were stuck, would gravity not take care of the rest?