Why is Nick so much better than Nate?

lol'ed at roided up Silva, I think he just took something to help him recover and cut weight and you make it sound like he was in there with 20 inch arms haha

Just because his injury looked dramatic doesn't mean he needs roids to recover from it. His injury wasn't as bad as an ACL tear in terms of rehab.
 
Although as someone pointed out it isn't necessarily backed up by record, I do believe Nick is the superior fighter. Almost all Nick's fights have been championship level competition, and he's just tougher mentally when things get hairy.
 
I really don't think that Nick is that much better a fighter than Nate. Nate has shown moments of brilliance, that I haven't seen as much of as in Nick. However, Nate is, in my opinion, less consistent. That said, I think Nate's had tougher fights; whereas Nick's taken the road of "least resistance".
 
Back
Top