- Joined
- Oct 6, 2003
- Messages
- 4,113
- Reaction score
- 0
Well, it's my opinion. She looks strong to me and I'm talking about Cyborg vs untrained guys before you say she is looking weak against these professionals.
Another white knight. Pathetic.
Well, it's my opinion. She looks strong to me and I'm talking about Cyborg vs untrained guys before you say she is looking weak against these professionals.
I don't watch women's sports in general. But (aside from Federer) I prefer women's tennis because the men almost all do the same thing. stay at the baseline and hit the ball back and forth; the women mix up their game (Fed does too that's why he's my favorite).What's your favourite wnba team? How about chick soccer team? Football? Obviously you watch cause chicks are as good as guys, right?![]()
They are not as good as the men playing, but they are a hundred times better than you. How does that make you feel?What's your favourite wnba team? How about chick soccer team? Football? Obviously you watch cause chicks are as good as guys, right?![]()
For the non-tennis fans, this is nonsense. It's the equivalent of someone saying they prefer women's basketball because all the men do is go one-on-one and dunk. It's the equivalent if someone were to say something like they prefer WMMA because men just stand in the middle and trade.I don't watch women's sports in general. But (aside from Federer) I prefer women's tennis because the men almost all do the same thing. stay at the baseline and hit the ball back and forth; the women mix up their game (Fed does too that's why he's my favorite).
And of course any pro man on the tour would dominate the WTA but that's not the point, women aren't suppose to be as good at sports as men just like how small guys shouldn't be able to stand a chance against bigger fighters.
Terrible analogy and John wooden said he preferred the WNBA, I never watched a full WNBA game but are you saying Wooden didn't understand basketball?For the non-tennis fans, this is nonsense. It's the equivalent of someone saying they prefer women's basketball because all the men do is go one-on-one and dunk. It's the equivalent if someone were to say something like they prefer WMMA because men just stand in the middle and trade.
It indicates the person either
a) doesn't really watch tennis
b) watches but doesn't understand what they are seeing beyond the most superficial
c) is a white knight
d) some combination of the above
The only thing correct in the above is that Federer does have the most well-rounded and greatest tennis game of all time.
That's not what John Wooden said. What he said regarding women's basketball is very well-known and in his statements he never mentioned the WNBA or anything about "preferring" the women's game.Terrible analogy and John wooden said he preferred the WNBA, I never watched a full WNBA game but are you saying Wooden didn't understand basketball?
There is nothing but superficial in the men's tennis game, they serve then if they can't hit an ace or jump on a return they hit baseline shots until someone misses. Next to no one ever comes to net, they don't hit drop shots etc. no one ever does anything but hit from the baseline at least 95% of the time.
The MMA analogy is absurd because the men are more varied. The men move more and have a more varied attack in general, male fighters also block or avoid way more strikes. in no way do male fighters stand and trade more often than WMMA fighters.
I'm sorry that me thinking WTA tennis is more entertaining to watch upsets you so much. I never said they were better; that would be absurd. I explicitly said any guy on the tour could dominate the WTA; so I don't know where you got white knight from that
he preferred the style of play (which was what I talked about from the beginning); not because they were female. Which was my point from the beginning. I assumed I didn't need to explain everything like I was talking to a child.That's not what John Wooden said. What he said regarding women's basketball is very well-known and in his statements he never mentioned the WNBA or anything about "preferring" the women's game.
If you got two things wrong in the first sentence I'm not going to bother reading the rest of what I'm sure is a bunch of nonsense.
Okay I exaggerated for effect, but my point was obvious.EDIT: Actually after posting I see in my response the "nothing but superficial" bit about men's tennis from your quote. You clearly know nothing about tennis.
They are not as good as the men playing, but they are a hundred times better than you. How does that make you feel?
Is this you?
I don't watch women's sports in general. But (aside from Federer) I prefer women's tennis because the men almost all do the same thing. stay at the baseline and hit the ball back and forth; the women mix up their game (Fed does too that's why he's my favorite).
And of course any pro man on the tour would dominate the WTA but that's not the point, women aren't suppose to be as good at sports as men just like how small guys shouldn't be able to stand a chance against bigger fighters.
Lol thanks, doctor.I dislike her for the same reasons I dislike Gadaelhea and Cyborg, because a look at their jaw and a listen to their voice tells you that they're cheats.
They're fighting women in a women's division, but are built like men, with testosterone levels of men.
Cheats
Lol thanks, doctor.
Im guessing you haven't met many lesbians before. Plenty of bulldykes out there with no need of roids to look and sound manly
Raquel retired miesha on the nyc card i thought..
Tate and ShevchenkoPretty girls??
Nope.Ronda is pretty?![]()
Tate and Shevchenko
Compared to Amanda and her GF, she's more like Elisha Cuthbert.Miesha maybe. Shevchenko looks like fedor.
Compared to Amanda and her GF, she's more like Elisha Cuthbert.