- Joined
- May 10, 2018
- Messages
- 25,036
- Reaction score
- 36,218
This was highly competitive and he should have won if he knew what he was doing on the ground
He lay on a kickboxer who looked half the size of him for a bit and then gassed and got wrecked.
This was highly competitive and he should have won if he knew what he was doing on the ground
Maybe, Khabib was amazing at staying in control from a GnP position, but the damage he let off with his GnP was fairly meh compared to other fighters i've seen, visually anyway.I would have said Fedor or Khabib nr 1. Probably Khabib.,
Watch the Maurice Smith fight. He's sort of lost on the ground, despite having enormous potential with his strength.Tank was in love with his hands and didn't wrestle that much.
They did. You just chose Tank for some weird reason. Have you never seen Ken Shamrock beat up Christophe Leininger or Brian Johnston? How about Dan Severn brutalizing Oleg Taktarov? Or even Dave Beneteau annihilating Asbel Cancio? Tank had a wrestling background, but he wasn't a wrestler, hence your weird mystification.
hardly the same level as marc colemanI can't find it now.
This is what I can dig up ."He continued wrestling in college, where he was a NJCAA All-American."
hardly the same level as marc coleman
you're not saying anything new. tank was nowhere near the same level of wrestler as marc coleman. a junior college level wrestler is nowhere near the same what marc coleman accomplished. and there's your answer to the thread.Yeah but he was good.. better than people know. Tank had a knee injury his entire career.
you're not saying anything new. tank was nowhere near the same level of wrestler as marc coleman. a junior college level wrestler is nowhere near the same what marc coleman accomplished. and there's your answer to the thread.
dude, no. tank didn't have the same wrestling background, pedigree, all that shit. that's why he wasn't an effective wrestler. stop already.It's not relevant when it comes to defending against subs.
Not really true. Of course Coleman and Kerr wrestled better; they were on the world team; elite wrestlers and NCAA champs. Tank dominated fighters that didn't have lot of wrestling on the ground; Severn was really the only one that dominated him in wrestling/control, and Severn was also on the world team.Tank was in love with his hands and didn't wrestle that much. Coleman and Kerr had better mma wrestling by far for the early days.
Tank was good at GNP for his day, he just knew nothing of submissions.
He lay on a kickboxer who looked half the size of him for a bit and then gassed and got wrecked.
Good BJJ guys had been doing that for a long time before it become more well known from UFC1.I've always wondered why early MMA wrestlers like Tank Abbott were at a such a disadvantage on the ground against jiujitsu despite cross training BJJ.. Wheras later ones made a living out of it.
Why couldn't the early wrestlers learn the pitfalls and use their G&P to the same extent at later fighters like Coleman?
Was that phase of MMA simply not developed enough? Or were they too lazy?

You just chose Tank for some weird reason.
That's my point.

Maybe, Khabib was amazing at staying in control from a GnP position, but the damage he let off with his GnP was fairly meh compared to other fighters i've seen, visually anyway.
I don't think he was particularly gifted in any area other than having a decent smack on him.Yeah his cardio was TERRIBLE.