- Joined
- Sep 8, 2010
- Messages
- 845
- Reaction score
- 24
Title say it all. I'm not extremely familiar with the overall history of Pancrase unfortunately, though I have watched a few fights and I genuinely really dig the old school rule sets and fights of Pancrase (despite some of them being fixed apparently), they looked like shoot/non-fixed pro wrestling matches with open-palmed strikes (the grappling seemed pretty fast-paced and honestly more exciting than a No-Gi BJJ match IMO, Masakatsu Funaki is pretty exciting to watch IMO).
I'm just curious why Pancrase never reach the level of notoriety and fame that Pride did. I'm curious to know why the owners of Pancrase never attempted to build up their divisions in a similar fashion as Pride, especially after Pride disbanded and the fact that Pancrase has been around since the UFC.
I'd also would like to know why did Pancrase abandoned the pro-wrestling-esque rule-set and ring in favor of a cage? According to wiki, the previous rule-set prohibited knees & stomps/kicks on the ground & banned elbows whereas the current rule-set is similar to Pride except there's no knees on the ground. Either way, I personally believe they probably should've kept the ring instead but I'm curious as to their justification for the change.
I'm just curious why Pancrase never reach the level of notoriety and fame that Pride did. I'm curious to know why the owners of Pancrase never attempted to build up their divisions in a similar fashion as Pride, especially after Pride disbanded and the fact that Pancrase has been around since the UFC.
I'd also would like to know why did Pancrase abandoned the pro-wrestling-esque rule-set and ring in favor of a cage? According to wiki, the previous rule-set prohibited knees & stomps/kicks on the ground & banned elbows whereas the current rule-set is similar to Pride except there's no knees on the ground. Either way, I personally believe they probably should've kept the ring instead but I'm curious as to their justification for the change.