• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Why Assad kept using Sarin gas in Damascus suburbs

dragonsfly

----------------------------
Banned
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
9,240
Reaction score
4,581
Assad gathered almost all of his forces towards one particular stubborn enclave in Damascus eastern suburb called Eastern Ghouta. After 2 months of heavy scale fighting when Assad forces reached the urban parts stopped up and started bizarre negotiations and releasing constantly fake reports of meeting with rebels or rebels agreeing to relocation to be transfered to Idlib etc etc.

To the point that they were begging the rebels to be transfered with their families and light weaponry exclusive service. I also believe they paid the leaders alot of money for doing so.

There was 3 major groups in this area the two smallest accepted the deal while the largest one who are located in Douma refused. NOW here comes the fun fact and why Assad used chemical attacks.

Douma being a city with high density population and buildings was not going to be easy. Assad lost alot of manpower and hardware and as time past by the rebels were immune to airstrikes. Assad and his allies were losing manpower, hardware and most important of all alot of money. So they resorted to using Sarin gas as an option to bringing down the solid defenses of the rebels in Douma.

I for one was not surprised seeing the regime using Sarin gas because it was highly predictable. Nobody knows the type of losses Assad is taking except someone who understand military reality on the ground. Going in head first on a highly populated urban city with multiple bulidings and labyrint is not easy and especially when there are tunnels everywhere so airstrikes is not so effective.

They been trying hard to relocate the last group of the rebels who just simply refused to be relocated
 
So why not use a blockade and starve them like Saudi Arabia does to their enemies in Yemen?

Why use the known pet peeve that the West can use as an excuse to spread Democracy?
 
So why not use a blockade and starve them like Saudi Arabia does to their enemies in Yemen?

Why use the known pet peeve that the West can use as an excuse to spread Democracy?

They have tunnels to smuggle food in and they have also stored some food..

There is total siege on them when it comes to food entrance and nothing enters through gov't check points. It comes under the earth via tunnels
 
So why not use a blockade and starve them like Saudi Arabia does to their enemies in Yemen?

Why use the known pet peeve that the West can use as an excuse to spread Democracy?

Because Assad is a dick.
 
Because Assad is a dick.

Why would he need gas "to be a dick" instead of just using high-explosives that is apparently still a perfectly fine way to kill people?

"Because Assad is a dick."

Isn't it telling that this is the best explanation for the goverment carrying out this attack?

No evidence needed - just a whiff of a wrongdoing and you have Americans high on self-righteous emotions.
 
Because Assad is a dick.
He is a dick but these chemical attacks are too convenient for the anti-Assad lobby. Such attacks only brings increased pressure on Assad. Why would he want western pressure and give his enemies a pretext for attacks when he has almost won. It makes no sense. Are we to believe he is going to shoot himself in the foot when the war is nearly over and Trump has signalled he is going to pull US troops out.
 
You don't use sarin gas right after the US took out over 200 of your well trained mercenaries including tanks and AA guns.
 
He is a dick but these chemical attacks are too convenient for the anti-Assad lobby. Such attacks only brings increased pressure on Assad. Why would he want western pressure and give his enemies a pretext for attacks when he has almost won. It makes no sense. Are we to believe he is going to shoot himself in the foot when the war is nearly over and Trump has signalled he is going to pull US troops out.

Why would he have snipers indescriminately kill civilians in the streets? Why would he drop barrel bombs in populated areas non stop for years? Why did he starve entire towns, and block aide workers? All of these are war crimes.

He also used gas before without repercussions.

If Assad didn't do it, then who did and what is their motive?
 
Also the SAA have been making deals all throughout the war. When victory is certain, the SAA offers the relocation deal. It's better to have your enemy concentrated in one area.
 
Why would he have snipers indescriminately kill civilians in the streets? Why would he drop barrel bombs in populated areas non stop for years? Why did he starve entire towns, and block aide workers? All of these are war crimes.

He also used gas before without repercussions.

If Assad didn't do it, then who did and what is their motive?
Hillary?
 
Ya, the timing on this is ridiculously stupid on the part of Assad and convenient for his enemies. I don't know what happened.
 
He is a dick but these chemical attacks are too convenient for the anti-Assad lobby. Such attacks only brings increased pressure on Assad. Why would he want western pressure and give his enemies a pretext for attacks when he has almost won. It makes no sense. Are we to believe he is going to shoot himself in the foot when the war is nearly over and Trump has signalled he is going to pull US troops out.

It might be a way to send a message to the people still fighting him: "I can gas you and the US ain't gonna do jack shit. Nobody is going to lift a finger to help you, so you might as well surrender".

Such a move of course would only make sense if he has reason to believe that Trump truly isn't going to do shit.
 
It might be a way to send a message to the people still fighting him: "I can gas you and the US ain't gonna do jack shit. Nobody is going to lift a finger to help you, so you might as well surrender".

Such a move of course would only make sense if he has reason to believe that Trump truly isn't going to do shit.

<23>

Airfields and runways were/are being bombed.

The US has the capability to do a lot of damage in a short period of time which they demonstrated in Deir Ez Zor.

Why would the SAA provoke that again?
 
Last edited:
Clearly John Bolton's work. First week on the job and chemical weapons are used in Syria? Coincidence!?
 
Why would he have snipers indescriminately kill civilians in the streets? Why would he drop barrel bombs in populated areas non stop for years? Why did he starve entire towns, and block aide workers? All of these are war crimes.

He also used gas before without repercussions.

If Assad didn't do it, then who did and what is their motive?
Snipers and barrel bombs do not evoke the kind of visceral reaction amongst the Western establishment that WMDs use does.
 
It might be a way to send a message to the people still fighting him: "I can gas you and the US ain't gonna do jack shit. Nobody is going to lift a finger to help you, so you might as well surrender".

Such a move of course would only make sense if he has reason to believe that Trump truly isn't going to do shit.
But Assad lost lots of equipment and personnel from Western retaliation to alleged chemical weapons use. It is clearly in his best interest to not use chemical weapons.
 
Snipers and barrel bombs do not evoke the kind of visceral reaction amongst the Western establishment that WMDs use does.

I agree, but he's used chemical weapons in the past and nothing happened.

We're trying to look at the issue logically and that's the problem. What's logical to a middle eastern dictator that's been embroiled in war for 7 years now, may not be logical to the average Joe westerner hanging out on a karate forum.
 
Assad is a white man with a funny name. I found that odd.
 
Back
Top