• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Why Ariel should have been banned

nated0g43

Blue Belt
@Blue
Joined
Mar 30, 2006
Messages
818
Reaction score
1
UFC has this big secret they are waiting to announce at UFC 199. They don't sweat it when Conor pulls out. They were already planning it then. In fact Dana was asked prior to Conor pulling about what remaining fights would be on the card, he replies with "We have a big one we are working on" or something to that effect.

Weeks go by and Dana lets Mark Hunt know to "stay ready" for 200. Most people think it has something to do with Cain getting hurt, but no one even suspects the real reason.

Think already, how many people already know about Brock possibly signing. Not only in the UFC, put just as many WWE employees probably do.

On top of this, the UFC has probably already spoken to ESPN to schedule a sit down conversation with Brock for the Monday following the big announcement at UFC 199. Not only are more people in the UFC aware now, but always who knows how many ESPN employees.

Here comes fight day, and every MMA fan in the world (Ariel included) is oblivious to the fact that Brock is scheduled to fight at 200 against Hunt. No rumors of any kind about Brock's return have been circulating around the internet. The UFC has a new promo ready to air at UFC 199 ( I wonder how many more people that brought into know) to hype the return of Brock.

Ariel then shows up with his press credentials and gets backstage access. No less than an hour or two later he is leaking news about the return of Brock for UFC 200.

There are a few things I want you to take away from this.

1 - It was supposed to be a big secret that Brock was returning. The proof being is that probably hundreds of people knew about it, yet no one even let out the slightest hint. No one expected Brock to return.

2 - Ariel knew this also. He isn't an idiot. He knew when he found out this news an hour before the event that it was going to be the UFCs big announcement. He knew this and probably got great satisfaction in knowing he was going to spoil it by reporting it before the big promo aired.

3 - Ariel probably would have never gotten this information had he not shown up backstage at UFC 199. It's not like he got a text or phone call from a "source" with this information. He actually could have when I think about it, it could just be a coincidence that right after he showed up backstage, info started leaking (Conor vs Nate also). More than likely though, he was backstage being nosy and talking to people and trying to pry info out of them.

The point is (IMO) the only reason Ariel got the info to leak is b/c he was backstage poking his nose around (which he has is free to do). The UFC also has every right to restrict his access (which they did). For Ariel to act surprised or shocked that this happened is laughable. He knew exactly the risk he was taking when he did it. I hope it was worth it Ariel, you got your twitter a few more followers now.
 
Points 1.
2.
3.

This is the weirdest argument for fascism ever.
 
That's not how a free press works.
 
Last edited:
All I can say is this: If the UFC wants to be a big boy sport, they better expect reporters snooping around trying to find every little juicy nugget of gossip the can get, then leaking said gossip.....
 
Journalist should always be separate from the establishment and free to report on what they wish, the UFC's obligation is to control the flow of information from their end if they wish for it to remain a "suprise" (makes us sound like a bunch of toddlers at Christmas TBH).
In Ariel MMA hour he said Dana told him he needed to have a thick skin, i think it is now time for Dana to take his own advice.
 
TS--you are the ariel in this GIF...and empathy and social justice is going ALPHA on you son.

areq.gif
 
I don't need to read it all.

The UFC has reason to ban Ariel. Being an insider of the sport is a privilege not a right, and as someone who reports news he is told things in advance, not to report them himself, but to prepare a report for immediately after it is announced.

He breached that privilege.

If you want a real world example of this, If I Operated a retail store and sold a copy of a video game before it's street date to have the jump on my competition (in this case of Helwani the competition would be other mma journals, blogs and news outlets) I'd lose my privilege of having games before the street date, or I would no longer be allowed to sell games.

It's not really all that complicated, Helwani was trusted with information that was time sensitive and breached that trust. He paid the price for it, and he damn well knows what he did wrong.
 
The problem with that entire argument is that Ariel is the press, he doesn't work for the UFC PR department.

I think a lot of people here are looking at it without realizing that this is all about freedom of the press. So let's just say a reporter gets a hold of big news that Obama will announce the end of Obamacare in a press conference tonight. Do you think he'd leak that? Of course he would, it's his job, he's the independent press. Would the White House ban said reporter from all news conferences? Of course not, since that would be totalitarian and unconstitutional.

This isn't politics, there's not nearly as much at stake when people are lying, but this is still BS. It's sad to say that the UFC appears to be an organization that's anti-free press...free press being one of the cornerstones of a truly free society.
 
Actually, yes. They are called employers.

Outside of their respective news organization, are they going to receive a paycheck from another company that they might report on? You don't see a conflict of interest?
 
Didn't read, don't give a fuck and right now I'd rather see you banned.
 
You are naïve if you think UFC let all these hundreds of people know a secret they wanted kept quiet. No one would have known. Ariel is a journalist not a UFC employee.
 
Back
Top