Why are Nick Diaz and Tony Ferguson on the same card but not fighting?

Meathead Jock

WAR ASKREN
Joined
Sep 26, 2011
Messages
20,337
Reaction score
1,687
One of the strangest bookings of all time. Both are on the same card and yet not fighting each other?

If the UFC wanted to make them fight some young prospect where the young guy could make a name it would at least kind of make sense. Instead both are fighting old guys where win or lose no one is breaking the top 10.

So why is the fan favorite fight not taking place and will the deck get reshuffled to make it happen?
 
Last edited:
It is a business strategy to make money:

After this card, they can book an OL vs. OL fight as the co-main on a ppv, and a lot of people will buy it.
 
nick is still fighting luque, is that right? if so then i guess luque has said goodbye to his career. there's no moving up the ladder fighting a diaz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HHJ
They’re trying to get rid of both. Feeding them to more relevant fighters and send them off to die.,
 
I don't get how they're allowed to fight. Considering that Nick literally quit against Robbie.
Ferguson, on the other hand has one good round and then it's a steep fall. What's point of the NAC?
 
One of the strangest bookings of all time. Both are on the same card and yet not fighting each other?

If the UFC wanted to make them fight some young prospect where the young guy could make a name it would at least kind of make sense. Instead both are fighting old guys where win or lose no one is breaking the top 10.

So why is the fan favorite fight not taking place and will the deck get reshuffled to make it happen?
Ohhhhhh here we go again. Let me crush my nut. Wait a little........

Ok dude. You have to check the pre-event press conferences, specially the ones of Dana. He knows.
 
Nate vs Tony happened not long ago ….no need for Tony vs Nick
Nah, Nick and Nate are different fighters whose careers/lives have wildly diverged over the last 10 years. If you said this back in 2012, I'd probably agree. But Nick is a total mystery right now and Tony is.....Tony.

Who knows if Nick could submit Tony as easily as Nate did....has Nick even trained BJJ much at all since the Anderson fight (which had practically no grappling, nor did the Lawler rematch)?
 
I don't get how they're allowed to fight. Considering that Nick literally quit against Robbie.
Ferguson, on the other hand has one good round and then it's a steep fall. What's point of the NAC?
I mean theres nothing there to say that either guy cant fight.

Its just does anyone really wanna see that?
 
probably not but i'm assuming they are trying to just throw Cheisa and Luque a bone.

Diaz and Ferguson basically are considered hopeless at this point.
That makes sense, but will it be their final fights if they lose? Especially for Tony, who seems to be on a death wish to set the record of consecutive losses.

If we knew for sure these were "loser leaves the UFC" fights, I'd agree. But since we don't, I'd rather see Nick and Tony...and hope they'd both retire afterwards.
 
Back
Top