Why Are Neck Tattoos So Bad?

Necktats is just a goofy nickname.

I think all tattoos are dumb, and they rarely look decent even as art. Like even if that thing was a painting on the wall, it still looks bad

I just pretend to like em when people get them cuz i dont wanna hurt their feelings
 
Rav1nHunter said:
Cool thanks the 1 in 5 seems a bit made up ill have a read to see their sources.
Click to expand...
That's cool. It means you have a brain. Doing research and not blindly believing stuff is a GREAT thing.

Thumbs up to you.
 
Bend NvR Break said:
View attachment 292291

I downloaded the PDF so I could read it but I can't upload it to Sherdog

But clearly you see where it says 1 in 5 woman right?
Click to expand...
I just read a study that showed 91 percent of U.S. colleges didn't have a single sexual assault reported last year. Does that mean 9 percent of colleges are putting up huge numbers to make that national 1 in 5 stat?
 
every time i see someone with tattoos, i am glad i dont have any
 
Coolidge said:
I don't understand why Cody is made fun of for having neck tats. What's so bad about them? It's a perfectly legitimate place to put a tattoo. How is it any different than getting them on your sleeve, chest, back, or anywhere else?
Click to expand...
Let's just say he's lucky he's a damn good fighter and doesn't have to work a regular 9-5 type job. That's the biggest issue with neck tats.
 
Rav1nHunter said:
Cool thanks the 1 in 5 seems a bit made up ill have a read to see their sources.
Click to expand...

"The statistic comes from a 2007 Campus Sexual Assault study conducted by the National Institute of Justice, a division of the Justice Department. The researchers made clear that the study consisted of students from just two universities, but some politicians ignored that for their talking point, choosing instead to apply the small sample across all U.S. college campuses.

The CSA study was actually an online survey that took 15 minutes to complete, and the 5,446 undergraduate women who participated were provided a $10 Amazon gift card. Men participated too, but their answers weren’t included in the one-in-five statistic.

If 5,446 sounds like a high number, it’s not — the researchers acknowledged that it was actually a low response rate.

“Another limitation of the CSA study, inherent with Web-based survey, is that the response rates were relatively low,” the researchers said. “Although the response rates were not lower than what most Web-based surveys achieve, they are lower than what we typically achieve using a different mode of data collection (e.g. face-to-face interviewing).”

Nineteen percent of women who responded to the survey said they had experienced some kind of sexual assault, either attempted or completed (12.6 percent reported attempted sexual assaults,13.7 percent reported completed sexual assaults and some women reported both).

But a lot of those responses have to do with how the questions were worded. For example, the CSA study asked women whether they had sexual contact with someone while they were “unable to provide consent or stop what was happening because you were passed out, drugged, drunk, incapacitated or asleep?”

The survey also asked the same question “about events that you think (but are not certain) happened.”

That’s open to a lot of interpretation, as exemplified by a 2010 survey conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which found similar results.

Like the CSA survey, the CDC survey had a low response rate and nonrepresentative sample. As Christina Hoff Sommers of the American Enterprise Institute notes, “No one interviewed was asked if they’d been raped or sexually assaulted.

“Instead of such straightforward questions, the CDC determined whether the responses indicated sexual violation,” Hoff Sommers said.

The CDC survey also asked a question about sexual contact while “drunk, high, drugged or passed out and unable to consent.” The question did not make it clear that it applied only to instances of unwanted sexual contact."

The NSVRC is basing its numbers on that very same CSA study.
 
12ga. said:
Not really there are valid reasons to not get them. Tattoos are a waste of money for marginal people. I saw a homeless guy the other day covered and was thinking what if he invested all that ink money in a 401K or drip fund - would he still be homeless?

Tattoos are unhealthy or can be if not done with strict protocols.

Beyond that there are religious taboos. Although Christians seem to have relented in 21st century Muslims have not.

But even if you are right you decrease your marketability because those evil judgmental ppl wont hire your ass. It's just dumb.
Click to expand...
Dustin Martin, the face of AFL and the number one footy player on the planet
2017-10-26-09-38-10-.jpg

The most marketed player too.
 
Coolidge said:
"The statistic comes from a 2007 Campus Sexual Assault study conducted by the National Institute of Justice, a division of the Justice Department. The researchers made clear that the study consisted of students from just two universities, but some politicians ignored that for their talking point, choosing instead to apply the small sample across all U.S. college campuses.

The CSA study was actually an online survey that took 15 minutes to complete, and the 5,446 undergraduate women who participated were provided a $10 Amazon gift card. Men participated too, but their answers weren’t included in the one-in-five statistic.

If 5,446 sounds like a high number, it’s not — the researchers acknowledged that it was actually a low response rate.

“Another limitation of the CSA study, inherent with Web-based survey, is that the response rates were relatively low,” the researchers said. “Although the response rates were not lower than what most Web-based surveys achieve, they are lower than what we typically achieve using a different mode of data collection (e.g. face-to-face interviewing).”

Nineteen percent of women who responded to the survey said they had experienced some kind of sexual assault, either attempted or completed (12.6 percent reported attempted sexual assaults,13.7 percent reported completed sexual assaults and some women reported both).

But a lot of those responses have to do with how the questions were worded. For example, the CSA study asked women whether they had sexual contact with someone while they were “unable to provide consent or stop what was happening because you were passed out, drugged, drunk, incapacitated or asleep?”

The survey also asked the same question “about events that you think (but are not certain) happened.”

That’s open to a lot of interpretation, as exemplified by a 2010 survey conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which found similar results.

Like the CSA survey, the CDC survey had a low response rate and nonrepresentative sample. As Christina Hoff Sommers of the American Enterprise Institute notes, “No one interviewed was asked if they’d been raped or sexually assaulted.

“Instead of such straightforward questions, the CDC determined whether the responses indicated sexual violation,” Hoff Sommers said.

The CDC survey also asked a question about sexual contact while “drunk, high, drugged or passed out and unable to consent.” The question did not make it clear that it applied only to instances of unwanted sexual contact."

The NSVRC is basing its numbers on that very same CSA study.
Click to expand...
Have a read of the Times article i linked that study sound much more realistic
 
MMA Savant said:
I don't mind them as long as they look good like Conor's. Cody has a bunch of bullshit tats and is a poser. koi fish, 'self made', diamonds, some stars...fuck off with that shit. Think before you tattoo.
Click to expand...
{<huh}
Cody's is trash but Conor's is good??

btw, the only one with good tats in the ufc is Kid.
qGlCuvk.jpg
 
You guys think too much about it. In most circles it doesn’t even matter. Who cares where a professional athlete gets tatted. Tats on arms are fine, but we draw the line at necks and hands? What kind of shit logic is that?
 
That’s deep cool ridge
Almost as deep as my neck banger

59801546-8E4F-4272-BF58-B704550B30DE.jpeg


D1FC73B0-533F-4B38-B08A-A9E1A10A3493.jpeg
 
Gregolian said:
Let's just say he's lucky he's a damn good fighter and doesn't have to work a regular 9-5 type job. That's the biggest issue with neck tats.
Click to expand...

Systemic neck tat discrimination is not okay. It's the current year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,962
Messages
58,331,152
Members
176,002
Latest member
Shock7

Share this page

Back
Top