Who's career has been more impressive, GSP's or Anderson Silva's?

Who's career has been more impressive, GSP's or Anderson Silva's?

  • Total voters
    331
Dozer . said:
View attachment 410473
Click to expand...
giphy.gif

TotalSardonicBluebreastedkookaburra-max-1mb.gif
 
GSP has never been caught doing Steroids, so obv him.

But don't call him 2 div champion. Thats totaly fake,
he fought the weakest champ of all time... Bisping? lol

It's like calling Mcgregor 2 div champ.. fake aswell. he lost 2 fights in a row vs Nate and got an immediately TS vs a very weak champ/midget.

Both ran for their life after...

fake fake fake... but casual's believes in it
 
Vehap1 said:
GSP has never been caught doing Steroids, so obv him.

But don't call him 2 div champion. Thats totaly fake,
he fought the weakest champ of all time... Bisping? lol

It's like calling Mcgregor 2 div champ.. fake aswell. he lost 2 fights in a row vs Nate and got an immediately TS vs a very weak champ/midget.

Both ran for their life after...

fake fake fake... but casual's believes in it
Click to expand...

Duh
he ran away from USADA.
 
JackSchtotll said:
Where did I say that "cheating is not wrong"? This is unethical: to put words in someone's mouth. I never said that.

Anderson has been proven innocent of doping in both instances. What idiots online believe is completely irrelevant.

Anderson has always been a clean and better fighter than GSP. You are welcome.
Click to expand...
JackSchtotll said:
You know,
chatting with you has reminded of a work done by some psychologists. You fit the description quite well.

"People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of the participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)"
http://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1999-15054-002
Click to expand...
Wow, 2 replies to the same message, now I know your triggered.
<13>
If you keep saying he was proven innocent in his first failed test, then there is nothing left to discuss, so you can just carry on
 
UFCfan91 said:
Gsp has a miles better resume on paper

But if you could only watch one more fight in your life would you rather watch prime Anderson or prime GSP

It's Anderson and not even close
Click to expand...

? I strongly disagree with this.

GSP vs Fitch is a hell of an entertaining fight.
GSP vs Hughes 2 and 3.
GSP vs Penn 1.
GSP vs Condit was another really awesome, fun fight to watch.

Anderson’s best fight IMO is vs Forrest but that was an early finish. I don’t want to only watch 1 great round for the rest of my life.

His 5 rounder vs Sonnen was a good fight but it wasn’t particularly interesting until the end when he submitted him. It was shocking to see Anderson taken to task like that but the replay value isn’t great.

Anderson vs Hendo is another great fight of his, I could watch that over and over - but once again, a short fight.

If you could only watch one highlight reel for the rest of your life then Anderson wins that one. But only one fight? I go GSP.
 
JackSchtotll said:
this "avenge losses" is not an argument.

Top 5 competition....there were only 5 guys for him to fight anyways.
Click to expand...
this is the most pathetic thing i ever heard.

just because anderson only avenged 1 loss out of like 7 compared to gsp who avenged 2 losses out of 2.

you are such a hater. it is near comical.
 
grinderman said:
GSP.

Two div champ.

Avenged all losses.

Never lost a round.
Click to expand...
He lost rounds in several fights. He is a more skilled mma fighter, but Anderson was fun to watch and is far better.. Or was far better than gsp at striking. Career wise.. Gsp.
 
unfinishable said:
Wow, 2 replies to the same message, now I know your triggered.

If you keep saying he was proven innocent in his first failed test, then there is nothing left to discuss, so you can just carry on
Click to expand...

I hope you could understand the second one.
 
grinderman said:
this is the most pathetic thing i ever heard.

just because anderson only avenged 1 loss out of like 7 compared to gsp who avenged 2 losses out of 2.

you are such a hater. it is near comical.
Click to expand...

But I love GSP. I'm a huge fan, more so than you hysterical fangirls. I just happen to be realistic about his skills.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,136
Messages
57,970,305
Members
175,885
Latest member
gono

Share this page

Back
Top