- Joined
- Dec 31, 2004
- Messages
- 1,643
- Reaction score
- 356
aka guys who don’t want to see abc (another brown champ)
But Whitaker is a brown champion, no?
aka guys who don’t want to see abc (another brown champ)
Holy wall of txt Batman!http://www.fightmetric.com/fight-details/5a09fd7cb3db9705
3 rounds off?
Romero swarmed Whittaker in round 3. The only reason it wasn't a 10-8 was that Whittaker was landing nice counter-punches in the midst of getting fucked up for 2 mins. straight.
In round 4, Romero rocked Whittaker again- but Whittaker didn't end up getting dropped but was made wobbly from 2 punches. The judges gave the round to Whittaker because he landed more strikes throughout the round but it was obvious who delt more damage.
Round 5 should have been a clear 10-8 for Romero.
I don't understand how it wasn't.
Politics were the reason Romero didn't get the nod but that's ok because the fucker missed weight and shouldn't have got the title shot in the first place.
Don't say that people who thought Romero won aren't thinking like judges.
What you're doing, but don't understand it, is trying to imagine how Whittaker got the decision and trying to rationalize solely from that decision how it was logical.
It's a really common mistake with shitty decisions and agreeable MMA fans.
You look at a shitty decision and try really hard to understand it as if the judges made the right call and all the fans are wrong and try to rationalize to the ends of the earth to understand how it was right.
It was a really common theme when GSP got his ass kicked by Hendricks and his fans tried to convince themselves to the end of the earth that it was a sound call.
I understand that the point system might give it to Whittaker, but honestly Whittaker was broken. He was lost in the end, suffering from 2 heavy knock downs. I mean isn't that the essence of this sport? Breaking your opponent. Yeah sure a KO is better, but breaking your opponent like that is meaningful as well.
For me those heavy knock downs washes away the little lead Whittaker had on Romero for sure.
The difference with most of these bitches is:
When Buffer was reading the decision, you were surprised that Whittaker won.
You counted your blessings knowing that a dimwit judge handed Whittaker the win.
Not in the least I was confident that they were gonna give the dec to Reaper.
Why you ask? Because I am not so stupid as to think R3 & R5 was a 10-8 .
Whittaker 1, 2, and 4
Romero 3 and 5
no 10-8's
Whittaker wins 3-2 with only three limbs
You're right, because only round 5 was a 10-8 ( being generous).
Romero missed weight by the weight of about twenty pennies
2 oz
0.125 lbs
and everyone is acting like he was pounds over
I guess that means your blind opinion doesnt matter then. Biased fanboy.Romero won hands down without question. Only a biased fanboy would see it otherwise. This coming from someone who doesn't care about either of these guys.
I guess that means your blind opinion doesnt matter then. Biased fanboy.
And that means what? Is this your claim to a higher intellect than me? Stay in school, fool.Nice like ratio...fanboy
And that means what? Is this your claim to a higher intellect than me? Stay in school, fool.
A 10-7 for the fifth round is a much more reasonable score than 10-9.
Gladly. If it keeps me away from retards like you. Im honored to call Ohio home. What have you got going for you?Stay in Ohio.
Gladly. If it keeps me away from retards like you. Im honored to call Ohio home. What have you got going for you?
That's pretty fucking stupid. Show me ANY round that has been judged 10-7 that looked anything like the 5th... I'll wait...