- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,010
- Reaction score
- 5,338
How about a loss to 15-16 Sitenkov?Tony lost to can's early on in his career. If anything Duffy is a better loss to have than Tony's first two.
At least Toney is 17-7.
How about a loss to 15-16 Sitenkov?Tony lost to can's early on in his career. If anything Duffy is a better loss to have than Tony's first two.
How about a loss to 15-16 Sitenkov?
At least Toney is 17-7.
Conor, khabib or tony?
Going of name basis alone (no dismissal of wins such as staph infection lee, ranked 11 one day notice real estate agent or close decision against nate ect)
with no context going of names alone who has the most impressive resume?
Imo its conor (aldo, eddie, max, dustin, nate, mendes) and i believe he is the best mixed martial artist overall out of the three
EACH FIGHTER NOTED WINS
conor-aldo,eddie,max,dustin,mendes,nate, dennis siver,brandao
Khabib-rda,conor,barboza
Tony-RDA,Lee,cowboy,pettis,barboza,josh thomson,lando,tibau
Anyone with a losing record is arguably a can.I mean you're now trying to justify who is the bigger can, that's clutching at straws.
Conor, khabib or tony?
Going of name basis alone (no dismissal of wins such as staph infection lee, ranked 11 one day notice real estate agent or close decision against nate ect)
with no context going of names alone who has the most impressive resume?
Imo its conor (aldo, eddie, max, dustin, nate, mendes) and i believe he is the best mixed martial artist overall out of the three
EACH FIGHTER NOTED WINS
conor-aldo,eddie,max,dustin,mendes,nate, dennis siver,brandao
Khabib-rda,conor,barboza
Tony-RDA,Lee,cowboy,pettis,barboza,josh thomson,lando,tibau
hes no better than Duffy. you guy joke around about UFC Gatekeepers and journeymen. Darabedyan is a journeyman in the C leagues.Darabedyan is no can.
....jesus christ. The shit you see in the heavies...how the fk would conor have a better resume than khabib when khabib has conor on his resume.
There are literally too many examples to bother listing. Someone can be better than someone else head to head, yet still not be as great as the person they hold a win over
he purposefully didnt include pat healy who was on 7 fights win streaks with wins over paul daley, carlos condit and dan hardy. but he somehow included lando vannatta in the notable wins of tony.....jesus christ. The shit you see in the heavies...
I'm not saying I agree with TS at all but that is not how this works. At all. Zero.
Let me put it in a really simple and easy to digest way for you and anyone else: if Khabib had ONE FIGHT, and it was a win over Conor, would he have a better RESUME than Conor with 1 single win?
There are literally too many examples to bother listing. Someone can be better than someone else head to head, yet still not be as great as the person they hold a win over
And I'll say it again because I already know the response that is likely coming: IM NOT SAYING I AGREE WITH TS
MMA resume: Conor, Khabib, Tony
LW resume: Khabub, Tony, Conor
i understand this but tony has finished the other comon opponents. including glesion tibau who many felt bested khabib
Why are you crediting Conors 145 wins at 155 ? And why not mention Tibau & Iaquinta for Khabib ? Both solid wins. Tony has the more notable victories, Khabib best accomplishments, Conor is not even in the discussion he doesn't have a deep resume at LW.