- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
- Messages
- 55,253
- Reaction score
- 92,810
Doug Gilbert
I think the 2003, one
He gets his arm chopped off and cuts his own leg deep with his chainsaw by mistake yet still lives.
Also this scene
I disagree the 2003 he was creepier, stealthier, stronger, seemed bigger, had more wild kills and better chase scenes. He also is severly injured for life and armless and his corrupt dad the 2nd muscle the "sheriff" is killed.
The first film overall was much more psychologically intense. Leatherface in film one was a creepy maniac, ill go with film one.
I only saw the OG, so that's my default choice.
I always thought Leatherface was a Can, anyway. He wasn't in the same league as the Big Three: Michael, Jason and Freddy.
She looked so hot in that movie almost as hot as she did in The Rules of Attraction.Neither of them were particularly pleasant, but the 2003 version seems like he'd be the most problematic. That said, I might just have clearer memories of that flick, for some reason.
If I ever move to Texas the first thing I'm gonna buy is a chainsaw.
I remember seeing the remake in the theater, that scene was fucked up when you realize the mask he’s wearing.. I mean imagine being that chick in that moment and then seeing that.
The original film is more demented/creepy -but the remake is more brutal. Both are great films imo
That said re-make Leatherface seemed legit scary to deal with.
Neither of them were particularly pleasant, but the 2003 version seems like he'd be the most problematic. That said, I might just have clearer memories of that flick, for some reason.