Which fighter(s) suffer more from UFC Sale?

psg15

Orange Belt
@Orange
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
373
Reaction score
47
So I just realized with the sale of the UFC, a lot of the fighters that Dana and Lorenzo have favored or given special treatment are in for a rude awakening.

So which fighter or fighter(s) are going to suffer the most?

Ronda , Connor, or somebody you would never think of?
 
Who knows? Maybe all, maybe none

The likes of Chocolate L and Matt Hughes might be out of a job tho.
 
The man who benefits the most.

FedorIceCream_display_image.jpg
 
So I just realized with the sale of the UFC, a lot of the fighters that Dana and Lorenzo have favored or given special treatment are in for a rude awakening.

So which fighter or fighter(s) are going to suffer the most?

Ronda , Connor, or somebody you would never think of?
None, either the new owners will want business as usual or they won't want the bad press the UFC got for sticking it to the fighters. They will still see value in the big draw/media attractions so they will be fine. In truth this is either going to be a non issue for fighters or a really good thing.
 
Who knows? Maybe all, maybe none

The likes of Chocolate L and Matt Hughes might be out of a job tho.
Now that's for sure, there is no way these guys and Forrest stay on the pay roll.
 
If the sale is indeed to the Chinese, the fighters that have been making the most stink in favor of course union, Ali Act, reneging on contracts, directly making grievances public via the media, etc., may wake up to reality where terms "dictatorship" and "slave masters" would truly be applicable.
 
The big stars might become bigger after the sale. WME has deep connections in the entertainment industry.
 
I wont mind getting rid of Anik and Stann
 
Lower ends that are a questionable value
Higher ends that make too much and draw little
 
None, either the new owners will want business as usual or they won't want the bad press the UFC got for sticking it to the fighters. They will still see value in the big draw/media attractions so they will be fine. In truth this is either going to be a non issue for fighters or a really good thing.
How would it be a really good thing? I doubt a tenet of the deal is oh let's pay the non needle movers more - if anything they will pay more for players and less for non needle movers
 
Does the transfer of ownership keep all past contracts ? Or can Reebok go away sooner
 
Back
Top