- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,963
- Reaction score
- 35,164
I don't recall anything in the bible about movies. And I know had I never said poor people should be banned from going to movies.
Wait, you mean the Bible *doesn't* say that poor people shouldn't be allowed to go to movies? Sorry, SD Jesus, I must have been misinformed.
So you are saying I hate poor people now? You tried to deny it when I called you out on it before.
I get that you compare yourself to Jesus, but note that I don't refer to you when I talk about him. What's your justification for supporting that sickening Kansas law? In the thread, your defense was just "you're a troll if you don't agree with Anung."
If you think it's wrong to mischaracterize somebodies positions, well he who is without sin should cast the first stone.
If? Which characterization of your position was inaccurate?
And stalking? Lol. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. You sir should do some reflection on your lies about yourself and others. You can start with your sleazy post I'm addressing right now.
If you think I've told a lie here, what is it? I think "stalking" is appropriate, as you followed me around for years when I was ignoring you posting about me, and you still talk about me in threads I'm not even in, etc. You're pretty creepily obsessed.
So how do you think Jesus, or just a regular human being with a conscience, would feel about starving 500,000 children to death?
Not good. WTF are you talking about?
Drone striking families to death? I'm pretty sure he wouldn't change his position based on what party was in office like you have..
Again, you just lie constantly. I would support a strategy of "only hit intended targets with drones," as everyone else would. Your issue is that you're just mindlessly repeating propaganda. Doing nothing has serious negative consequences, sanctions have serious negative consequences, drones, boots on the ground, whatever. The question in any policy is "what's the best thing to do?" And given that policy (any area of policy) has tradeoffs, political opponents will focus on them and ignore the real choices. If you want to have a serious discussion of foreign policy, you should offer your opinion of what superior alternatives are and why and how we know that they're superior.
But movies are what's important in life, not nutrition or education or healthcare, arms and legs, or actual life. You feel the goverment's ultimate tyranny is not letting mothers use their Goverment assistance to pay for tattoos and casinos.
See, you're lying again (sigh). First, stop conflating completely different issues. Second, I think that dignity and mental life is very important. Telling people that if they get transfer payments (or other benefits) intended for the poor that they are not allowed to also go to swimming pools or the movies serves no benefit and is only done out of spite or an ignorant contempt for recipients of the transfers (which leads to the ridiculous belief that poor people need the gov't to tell them how to spend their money).
Last edited: