interesting, I'm doing some basic boxing drills. Just wondering how the advanced evasive techniques actually workUm no, it's not the Matrix. You just get used to the telegraphs, patterns, and know how to respond quickly. When you get good a playing piano you don't see the keys more clearly.
Edit: I guess in hindsight it could feel like they're coming more slowly if someone is a really bad puncher. But the guys that punch well always punch well. The terrible puncher feels slow because you see it coming from soooo far away and know what to do well before it gets there.
Yes. You learn every sign someone is going to punch, you learn to read patterns more quickly, and if you have a trainer who teaches you to manage distance, space = time. More space = more time. In other words when you can find critical distance, you have ample time to see punches coming.
I am huffy, but not because you contradicted what I said, but because I vehemently disagree with the implications. There is no need for you to turn this into something personal.
It may seem utterly insignificant, but the idea of getting better at doing something is so much more in line with striking arts than the idea of seeing things faster. One is reasonable and lends itself to goal-setting, one is just magic. Your view smells of chi and badly speaking in a language you don't understand.
So I stand by my huffiness, you're 100% wrong here.
Edit: Look at it from a new boxer's perspective (what we have in this thread apparently.) If the coach tells him "you can see punches faster after you train here for a while" that's completely useless. If the coach tells him, we're going to get you used to reacting to punches and looking for telegraphs" now all the sudden the guy has a goal and something to learn.
Where are you getting "a punch takes just 100ms from initiation to landing on target"? Most punches take far longer than that. 100ms is a VERY small period of time.You are better able to read the 'tells' that a punch is coming sooner which makes it seem like your reflexes are better when really its mostly due to having more time to react. That's why not telegraphing your shots is so important from an offensive perspective.
Some science about punching speed vs. reaction speed. It takes a fast human 100ms to react (that's the limit for false starts in the 100m) but a punch takes just 100ms from initiation to landing on target. As you can see it's almost impossible to react faster than a punch so boxers must be reacting to a cue which comes before the punch is thrown.
You standing there and keep trying to look for tells that aren't there is a good way to get beat up.
You just learn to see tell-tale signs. The slightest movements are a giveaway. But that's also a bad thing cuz against advanced students/boxers I get tricked a lot. Against newbies, I'm untouchable since I see the punch before they even do it.do incoming punches look slower? so you can dodge them?
And making someone miss because you have solid fundamentals is not "feeling like the punches are coming slower". Experience makes punches miss, but they're still coming just as fast and they still "feel" like they're coming fast and they still look like a blur.
If you fight a fast guy, you're not going to see half the punches in time no matter what you do.There is no "bullet time" perception. Even Berto landed something like 15% of his punches on Mayweather (which is out of context obviously but you get the idea.)