When people say Tony beats Conor easily..

I can see Tony strangling the life out of Conor. I can also see him on the wrong end of a pinpoint left.
 
6L0DXZ.gif


If duffy could do it, Tony can do it faster
 
says the 15 year old untrained keyboard warrior with no fight iq or intelligence who spams memes in every thread

hit the gym kid
Go watch some more Bruce Lee movies, boy. 70's karate movies are probably the closest you're ever going to be to a mat, fatso.
1516765372517.jpg
 
Realistic peolpe know either guy can win . It say that fight is closer to 50 50 than conor khabib. Both guys have strengths where the other guy has weaknesses . Conor khabib I have 60 40 Conor cause the fight starts on the feet but it' either conor finishes him early or a beatdown, No either way.
 
I bet you still rock your faded jean shorts and Affliction shirts at the mall. Flip flop warrior with the ever present Oakley wraparounds.
View attachment 331943
i feel you have pride hardcores mixed up with 2009 tuf fans

I get dumber reading literally anything you have to say

do the world a favour and do not have children.

thank you
 
Its hard for me to see how Fergsuon even troubles conor tnh

i can, Nate Diaz already "troubled" him, and in a lot of ways Tony is very similar to Diaz but better. he's tall, he's got good cardio, very good on the ground, the difference here i think is that Tony is stronger and has better footwork and hustle to keep pressure on Conor.

of course Conor could KO him, but i think it'll be harder than people think.
 
i think it's a very close fight

first 2 rounds will be very dangerous for tony but even the later rounds conor can still be dangerous
i have conor winning via tko in the 2nd, i think tony is just a bit too wild and will get caught

khabib on the otherhand, he beats the living shit out of conor and tkos him in the 3rd
 
i can, Nate Diaz already "troubled" him, and in a lot of ways Tony is very similar to Diaz but better. he's tall, he's got good cardio, very good on the ground, the difference here i think is that Tony is stronger and has better footwork and hustle to keep pressure on Conor.

of course Conor could KO him, but i think it'll be harder than people think.
nate has infinitely better boxing than tony. It's not even close. Tony does not possess the same threat on the feet as a welterweight version of Diaz, nor does he possess the same attributes
 
i feel you have pride hardcores mixed up with 2009 tuf fans

I get dumber reading literally anything you have to say

do the world a favour and do not have children.

thank you
If you're truly a Pride hardcore fan, you must die a little bit everyday knowing your boy is a fucking joke of a "fighter".
Go watch some Bushido and forget about being Conor's semen demon for a while.
Cheers, poser.
1514551645884.jpg
 
I think Tony is a harder fight for Conor than Khabib. Tony has more tools and an option for plan B. Khabib only has plan A.I think Conor beats both though.
 
Ferguson's losses are better than McGregor's. McGregor got submitted by Nate Diaz, Joe Duffy and Artemij Sitenkov. McGregor is 2 and 1 at 155 in the UFC. Split with Nate who is a gatekeeper and was gifted a title fight with Alvarez which he did win convincingly although Alvarez had zero game plan which proved stupid. Chad Mendes and Nate Diaz did way better on short notice vs. Alvarez.

Ferguson and Khabib have been crushing it at 155 in the UFC for a long time. Conor posts pictures of cars and wrist watches and fails to defend his title. He is truly the turd in the punch bowl. Get out of the way and let the real fighters fight and defend a belt. Conor has NEVER defended a belt. ZERO defenses.
 
Tony doesn't have good takedowns, he would get countered while trying to close the distance. Khabib is a much tougher fight
Tony rarely shoots for takedowns but he will get Conor down if wanted to. Tony was a very high level collegiate wrestler. He wrestled for the same school Kevin Lee wrestled for. Kevin even talked about how Tony was a wrestling legend in the school he wrestled for. Tony has very underrated striking as well. Dude stood toe to toe with RDA and Edson and beat them both. He fucked RDA up on the feet. I'm pretty sure his pressure would break Conor in 2 rounds. Tony keeps on coming on till he breaks you. Conor doesn't do well under pressure and has bad cardio. Tony would be a nightmare for Conor. Conor knows this unlike his stupid fans hence why he won't fight Tony.
gettyimages-621333264.jpg
Tony-RDA.jpg
3A1B2DA100000578-3909934-image-a-42_1478422486031.jpg
upload_2018-1-29_21-23-53.png
 
Last edited:
nate has infinitely better boxing than tony. It's not even close. Tony does not possess the same threat on the feet as a welterweight version of Diaz, nor does he possess the same attributes

i wouldn't say he has INFINITELY better boxing than Tony but it doesn't matter because he didn't outbox Conor did he?

Tony can avoid a lot of the boxing and punishment that Nate had to endure by having BETTER FOOTWORK. just not being there to get hit, and by using his kicks and length to make Conor come to him.

and i think Tony poses a bigger threat on the feet because of his unpredictability. Nate only throws 1-2s. not to mention Tony is much more explosive.

i think people are getting confused, Nate Diaz rocking a tired Conor McGregor doesn't = Nate Diaz boxed him up with superior punching technique and welterweight power.

the thing that beat Conor was his shitty cardio and Nate's chin, simple as that. if Nate was really such a great boxer he wouldn't have gotten completely picked apart in the 1st part of both fights.

just because you can take a good shot and all you do is throw punches doesn't = must be good at boxing.
 
sad part is, this is how much of sherdog thinks

actual analysis doesn't exist here for the most part
It's all true though...tony does in fact have better cardio than Conor and obviously has a better ground game( most of the UFC does). He does in fact have a better chin, Conor got rocked by a jab from Nate who is not a power guy. Conor literally only has a left hand compared to tony using both hands knees elbows and kicks, so tony does have more diversified striking. Not sure what you are confused on there...
And yes I would truly give any average high school wrestler a decent chance at beating mcgregor, any time he has faced opponents with any ground game he has gotten embarrassed one way or another
 
i can, Nate Diaz already "troubled" him, and in a lot of ways Tony is very similar to Diaz but better. he's tall, he's got good cardio, very good on the ground, the difference here i think is that Tony is stronger and has better footwork and hustle to keep pressure on Conor.

of course Conor could KO him, but i think it'll be harder than people think.

Tony's footwork is awful. The only thing Tony does better than Nate is he can actually defend a takedown and not get his leg battered. Do you think if Nate could do those two things he would have 11 losses? Hell, he'd be damn near undefeated too.
 
It's all true though...tony does in fact have better cardio than Conor and obviously has a better ground game( most of the UFC does). He does in fact have a better chin, Conor got rocked by a jab from Nate who is not a power guy. Conor literally only has a left hand compared to tony using both hands knees elbows and kicks, so tony does have more diversified striking. Not sure what you are confused on there...
And yes I would truly give any average high school wrestler a decent chance at beating mcgregor, any time he has faced opponents with any ground game he has gotten embarrassed one way or another

Jesus god dude, at least try to make some sense. Tony gets his ass laid on the mat everytime, he's not even close to Conor's level of striking.
 
Back
Top